I Understanding Space-Time & Fields: A Flowchart Guide

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quest_Ion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Space-time
Quest_Ion
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am having a very difficult time picturing space-time and fields and all...

Anyone here have a sort of flow chart or procedural chart that I could use to try to better wrap my head around what this place is?

Sort of starting with universe and then going into spacetime and from spacetime to fields or if spacetime is a field then put fields first or however it is ordered and then placement for field excitations (particles) coming from which field they come from? Like a flowchart?

Anyone have anything like that or maybe could you draw a rough sketch for me?
Is spacetime a singularly unified substance or field?

Is spacetime a collection of fields?

Are fields excitations of spacetime or is spacetime an excitation of something more fundamental?

If a force is an excitation of a field Is a field a non-excited force?

What is the starting point exactly?

etc?

example_only.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quest_Ion said:
Is spacetime a singularly unified substance or field?
An answer that can be given in terms of the current models and theories. For the Standard Model in flat space-time, space-time is neither a substance or a field. It appears as a group of real numbers that parametrize the quantum fields which make up the standard model. These 4 parameters transform under the Poincare group which is made up of the rotations, boosts and translations as do the SM fields. The General relativity space-time is again a real number parameters set but making up a mathematical object called a manifold.
 
Paul Colby said:
It appears as a group of real numbers that parametrize the quantum fields which make up the standard model.

Spacetime is a sort of measure, like in wave-collapse, or a conceptual measure on paper used for illustrating/measuring fields by people?

In the above diagram, I should replace spacetime with universe and the line between the universe and em field, I should label spacetime? Or is spacetime just a concept?

How would you map it as above?
 
Quest_Ion said:
is spacetime just a concept?
I can't think of anything in physical theories that isn't just a made up concept by definition. I once talked to someone who happen to meet Linus Pauling in a restroom. He asked him how he happened to develop his spin formalism. He said beaming down to my friend who was rather short; "I just made it up." Integers, real number, Hilbert spaces, quantum fields are all just things people made up / developed . Now, having said that, these things are very useful things because they work. My suggestion for a flow chart would go,

##\text{Physics}\rightarrow\text{Read Some}##

Other than this I'm at a loss to help.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top