Understanding Spinor's Helicity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Dirac Hamiltonian, helicity operator, and spin measurements in quantum mechanics. It establishes that while the Dirac Hamiltonian does not commute with the z-component of the spin operator (##S_z##), it does commute with the helicity operator (##h=S\cdot\hat{p}##). This allows for simultaneous knowledge of a particle's energy and helicity, but not its spin along the z-axis. The conversation highlights that measuring both spin and energy simultaneously is not feasible due to the non-commuting nature of their operators, except in specific cases where momentum is aligned with the chosen axis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically operators and observables.
  • Familiarity with the Dirac Hamiltonian and its implications in particle physics.
  • Knowledge of helicity and its mathematical representation in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic comprehension of angular momentum and spin operators in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical framework of the Dirac equation and its implications for particle behavior.
  • Learn about the commutation relations of quantum operators, particularly in the context of spin and momentum.
  • Explore the concept of helicity in greater detail, including its applications in particle physics.
  • Investigate the role of external fields, such as magnetic fields, in determining measurement axes in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the properties of spin and helicity in particle physics.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! The free Dirac hamiltonian doesn't commute with the z component of the spin operator ##S_z##, but it commutes with the helicity operator ##h=S\cdot\hat{p}##. This means one can know at the same time the energy and helicity of a particle, but not its spin along the z-axis. I am a bit confused about this. One can measure the momentum of a free particle and hence get its energy. So energy and momentum are simultaneous observables for a free particle. But so is helicity, too. So if I know the momentum of the particle, and choose my z axis to be in that direction, and I know it's helicity, too, don't I know (by the definition of helicity) the spin of the particle along the z, axis i.e. ##S_z##? What is wrong with my logic? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong, this is just not very useful for analysing any interesting situation, where you would usually have some other significant direction that dictates how you want to choose your coordinate system. For example a magnetic field in some direction, that you might want to choose to be the z direction rather than the direction of motion.
 
Dr.AbeNikIanEdL said:
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong, this is just not very useful for analysing any interesting situation, where you would usually have some other significant direction that dictates how you want to choose your coordinate system. For example a magnetic field in some direction, that you might want to choose to be the z direction rather than the direction of motion.
I am not sure I understand. In this situation I gave (which indeed is not very useful in practice), I am able (if my logic is correct) to measure the spin and energy of the particle at the same time. But their operators don't commute. Shouldn't it be impossible to measure both, no matter how I set up the axis? For example, in the momentum position case, no matter what system I choose, or how I place my axis (or what I do whatsoever) I will never be able to precisely measure both. Why could I do that here?
 
No, you are able to measure the projection of the spin along the direction of motion of the particle. Calling that direction z does not really change anything. If you go through the math you will see that Hamiltonian and ##S_z## operator do commute if ##p_x=p_y=0## (which is just a special case of saying that helicity commutes with the Hamiltonian).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K