Understanding Spring Constant: 8.0kg Stone Compression

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the spring constant for an 8.0kg stone compressing a spring by 10.0cm. The initial calculation incorrectly equates the gravitational force (80N) to the spring potential energy, resulting in an erroneous spring constant of 1.6 N/cm. The correct spring constant, as per the textbook, is 0.8 N/cm. The discrepancy arises from a misunderstanding of the energy equations and unit conversions, highlighting the importance of careful dimensional analysis in physics problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Hooke's Law and spring potential energy
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions in physics
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Hooke's Law and its applications in mechanics
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Study dimensional analysis techniques to avoid common mistakes
  • Practice problems involving spring constants and potential energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding spring dynamics and energy conservation principles.

JFlash
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The first part of this problem says that a 8.0kg stone rests on top of a spring, and compresses it by 10.0cm. It then asks what the spring constant is. This is the work I did (assuming g = 10m/s^2, not 9.8m/s^2):

(8.0kg)(10m/s^2) = 1/2k(10cm)^2; 80N = 50cm; k = 1.6

But, the textbook says the answer is .8. I don't understand why it's half my answer. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the left hand side, you have the gravitational force,
[tex]F_g = m g[/tex]
On the left hand side, you have the spring potential energy,
[tex]W_s = \frac12 k x^2[/tex]
Try taking the force exerted by the spring as well
[tex]F_s = k x[/tex]

Actually, you could have noticed this mistake by looking at the units... you wrote down 80N = 50cm. Even if you meant
80 N = 50 cm^2 * k (N/cm)
you would have equated N to N cm.
Try to train yourself in spotting these mistakes: unless you know how to convert Newtons into Newtons times centimeters, an alarm bell should go off automatically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K