Undergrad Understanding Stability Regions in Numerical Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of stability regions in numerical methods, specifically the Euler method and its stability criteria. The stability region is defined in the complex plane, where the horizontal axis represents real values and the vertical axis represents imaginary values. For the Euler method, stability is maintained when the condition -2 < hk < 0 is satisfied, where hk corresponds to the product of the step size (h) and a complex number (k). The conversation also touches on the implications of stability regions for more complex numerical methods, such as Runge-Kutta methods and hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis and its application in numerical methods
  • Familiarity with the Euler method and its stability criteria
  • Knowledge of Runge-Kutta methods and their properties
  • Basic concepts of numerical stability in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the stability regions of the Runge-Kutta methods
  • Explore the implications of complex step sizes in numerical methods
  • Study the stability analysis of hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Learn about the application of complex analysis in numerical stability
USEFUL FOR

Numerical analysts, mathematicians, and engineers involved in computational methods for differential equations, particularly those focusing on stability analysis and numerical method optimization.

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I am reading about the stability of different numerical methods, although never exactly came across a good definition of what stability regions are. For example, considering this plot, what exactly is the figure representing? What do the unlabelled axes mean in this context? Are these stability regions the same for a particular numerical method regardless of the problem considered?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The plot is showing the values of z in the complex plane where the Euler method is stable. The horizontal axis are the real values and the vertical axis are the imaginary values. z is allowed to be complex for the reason that complex analysis provides methods for determining the stable regions. But in the example shown, the real values z = hk are the ones that apply. So as long as -2 < hk < 0, z = hk is in the Euler method stable region. The paragraph just above gives some explanation of the Runge-Kutta methods in general and you can see in the first line where ∅(hk) is defined and that leads to studying ∅(z).
 
FactChecker said:
The plot is showing the values of z in the complex plane where the Euler method is stable. The horizontal axis are the real values and the vertical axis are the imaginary values. z is allowed to be complex for the reason that complex analysis provides methods for determining the stable regions. But in the example shown, the real values z = hk are the ones that apply. So as long as -2 < hk < 0, z = hk is in the Euler method stable region. The paragraph just above gives some explanation of the Runge-Kutta methods in general and you can see in the first line where ∅(hk) is defined and that leads to studying ∅(z).

Thank you for the explanation! If hk corresponds to a step size, what is the meaning of a negative region of stability? Also, what exactly are the units for -2 < hk < 0? Wouldn't this be simply defined based on how I scale my domain?
 
looking closer at the link explanation, I see that k can be a complex number and h looks like a step size. So hk is not necessarily a real number. The entire stability circle of the diagram, including complex values of hk applies.
 
FactChecker said:
looking closer at the link explanation, I see that k can be a complex number and h looks like a step size. So hk is not necessarily a real number. The entire stability circle of the diagram, including complex values of hk applies.

So do all methods always have their stability based on its properties when testing the equation: ##y' = ky## specifically? If so, isn't this kind of arbitrary and likely not a very practical definition when considering more complex cases (e.g. hyperbolic PDEs)? And are we assuming then that ##h## must be a step on a real-valued domain?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K