Understanding Tension, Weight, and Forces: A Scientific Inquiry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the tension (T) in a system involving mass (m), gravitational force (mg), and acceleration (a). The equation T = m(g - a) is established as correct when the signs of gravitational force and acceleration are opposite. A participant argues that T should equal m(g + a) if both forces are considered in the same direction. This highlights the importance of vector orientation in force calculations, emphasizing that the direction of acceleration must align with the tension direction for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Basic knowledge of vector forces and their components
  • Familiarity with gravitational force calculations
  • Concept of acceleration in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Learn about the implications of directionality in force equations
  • Explore examples of tension in various physical systems
  • Investigate the effects of different acceleration scenarios on tension calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of forces and tension in physical systems.

soljaragz
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
There is a problem I am looking at and in its explanations for the answer it says

"...We know the sum of forces acting on m is T-mg which is equal to ma. Therefore, T=m(g-a)..."

um...Shouldn't T=m(g+a)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
soljaragz said:
There is a problem I am looking at and in its explanations for the answer it says

"...We know the sum of forces acting on m is T-mg which is equal to ma. Therefore, T=m(g-a)..."

um...Shouldn't T=m(g+a)?
Yes, provided the signs of g and a are opposite. This is explicit in T = m(g-a), where g and a are the magnitudes of the vectors [itex]\vec{g} \text{ and } \vec{a}[/itex].

AM
 
Doesn't make sense to me. a should be oriented so that + is in the direction of the tension and - is in the direction of gravity. It shouldn't be an absolute value. Anyway if they want to use it as an absolute value in the second part they should have been doing that in the first part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K