Understanding the "Bank" in RCCA Bank

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack8rkin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the term "bank" in the context of the Rod Cluster Control Assembly (RCCA) in nuclear reactors, specifically focusing on its application in Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) and boiling water reactors (BWRs). Participants explore the structure and function of control banks, their operational characteristics, and the terminology used in different reactor designs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that "bank" refers to a group of RCCAs used for purposes like reactivity compensation and reactor scram.
  • It is noted that in PWRs, banks are typically withdrawn or inserted gradually and sequentially.
  • Participants discuss the role of scram rods, which are rapidly inserted into the core, contrasting them with control banks.
  • There is mention of shutdown banks in PWRs that are not used for reactivity control and are either fully inserted or fully withdrawn.
  • Some participants describe the arrangement of RCCAs into control banks to manage neutron suppression in high flux regions.
  • One participant introduces the concept of varying terminology across different plants, specifically referencing AREVA terminology related to RCCA grouping.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the symmetry of RCCAs in relation to the core center and the grouping of rods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic definitions and functions of control banks and RCCAs, but there are nuances in terminology and operational practices that remain contested. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on the arrangement and purpose of control rods in different reactor types.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the specific operational practices of different reactor designs and the potential for varying terminology, which may affect understanding. Some assumptions about the grouping and control of RCCAs are not fully explored.

Jack8rkin
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

Just wanted to clarify about the "bank" in the term RCCA bank.

RCCA is Rod Cluster Control Assembly. It's basically several control rods on a spider.
So, "bank" means a group of such RCCAs that are intended for some purpose (i.e. reactivity compensation, reactor scram etc.).

Am I right saying so?

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, at least for PWRs. Typically the banks are withdrawn or inserted gradually and sequentially in a pre-determined way.
 
gmax137 said:
Yes, at least for PWRs. Typically the banks are withdrawn or inserted gradually and sequentially in a pre-determined way.

Thank you. Exactly, I was asking about PWRs.
But there are also scram rods. I believe they are shot down into the guide thimbles and reach the core bottom very fast. Is it correct?
 
Jack8rkin said:
Thank you. Exactly, I was asking about PWRs.
But there are also scram rods. I believe they are shot down into the guide thimbles and reach the core bottom very fast. Is it correct?
There are shutdown banks that have a fair amount of worth, but all rods in a PWR are simply dropped into the core under gravity when the magnetic coupling ceases.

Some PWRs use a control bank or grey bank with lesser reactivity for load following or frequency control capability, or axial power shaping. They use an Inconel absorber, or less (fewer rods/fingers) of the primary neutron absorber.

BWRs also have banks of control rods (control blades) which are hydraulically inserted into the core from below. Some more modern designs use a fine motion screw, but they are also hyraulically scrammed into the core when necessary.
 
Thank you!
 
A single control rod is like a single fuel rod - just one piece. An RCCA is, like you said, a group of 20 or 24 control rods that insert into a single fuel assembly. A control bank is a group of 4 or 8 RCCA's which are located in radially symmetric positions around the core. The RCCA's are divided and arranged into banks specifically so that they suppress neutrons in high flux regions as other banks are inserted in sequence. Of the control banks, typically two banks are designated as "shutdown banks" and are not used for reactivity control - they are either all the way in while shut down or all the way out while critical. The purpose of the shutdown banks is to provide sufficient shutdown margin.
 
QuantumPion said:
A single control rod is like a single fuel rod - just one piece. An RCCA is, like you said, a group of 20 or 24 control rods that insert into a single fuel assembly. A control bank is a group of 4 or 8 RCCA's which are located in radially symmetric positions around the core. The RCCA's are divided and arranged into banks specifically so that they suppress neutrons in high flux regions as other banks are inserted in sequence. Of the control banks, typically two banks are designated as "shutdown banks" and are not used for reactivity control - they are either all the way in while shut down or all the way out while critical. The purpose of the shutdown banks is to provide sufficient shutdown margin.

Thank you so much for such a detailed response!
 
Last edited:
The terminology may vary form plant to plant - the AREVA terminology used with the EPR is to have individual RCCA:s assigned to fixed groups of 4 symmetrical RCCAs each, and the control banks are created by joining one or more groups together. The idea between this "double grouping" is that you can design and control the power and axial offset by controlling always the same banks, but you can change the actual physical RCCAs (=groups) that belong to these banks everry few weeks to prevent history effects caused by extended insertion of a control rod in one position.
 
Last edited:
rmattila said:
individual RCCA's assigned to fixed groups of 4 symmetrical rods each.

Did you mean 4 symmetrical RCCAs each? (Symmetrical with respect to the core center, right?)
Or rods from a certain RCCA could be assigned to two diferent groups (which seems to be unlikely)?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Jack8rkin said:
Did you mean 4 symmetrical RCCAs each? (Symmetrical with respect to the core center, right?)

That's right, I should've been more clear in my expression. I made a correction in the text.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
18K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K