Understanding the Complex Inner Product: Definition and Importance

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the definition and significance of the inner product in complex mathematics, particularly the notation A*B versus AB*. Participants highlight that the inner product is conventionally defined as linear in the first variable and antilinear in the second, though physics texts may reverse this. The distinction between these definitions is crucial, as A*B and AB* can yield different results, raising questions about the underlying reasoning for these conventions. Additionally, the applicability of inner products in different contexts, such as vector spaces and functions, is examined, emphasizing that certain definitions may not hold universally. Understanding these conventions is essential for clarity in mathematical and physical applications.
unchained1978
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
When studying complex numbers/vectors/functions and so forth you constantly encounter the idea of an inner product of two quantities (numbers/vectors/functions). It's represented as A*B is the inner product of two of these, but I've never been convinced why it couldn't also be AB*, as this is some cases yields a different answer. It seems arbitrary to me that it is defined in either way. Can someone explain to me the correct definition and also why it is correct? Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most math books define inner products and semi-inner products to be linear in the first variable and antilinear in the second. Most physics books define them to be linear in the second variable and antilinear in the first. These are just two different conventions.

What do you mean by A*B and AB*. Are A and B complex numbers, n×1 matrices, or something else? If they are n×1 matrices, then <A,B>=AB* doesn't work, since the right-hand side is an n×n matrix. (Note that A* and B* are 1×n matrices). But you could define <A,B>=B*A if you want to.
 
Just talking about vectors and functions for the moment. The star denotes the complex conjugate of the element to the left of it in the way I've written it. The motivation for the question is just that, if you consider two vectors A and B, then A*B=/AB* for the general case, and vice versa. I'm trying to understand if it's merely a convention to define it this way or if there exists some mathematical reasoning behind it, because the fact that two different products arise from the same two vectors seems to be a problem to me.
 
The inner product on ℂ is pretty useless, since ℂ is a 1-dimensional vector space.

If the vector space is the set of functions from a set X into ℂ, then <f,g>=f*g isn't an inner product, since f*g is a function, not a member of ℂ. (The "complex conjugate" of a function is defined by f*(x)=f(x)* for all x, and the product of two functions is defined by (fg)(x)=f(x)g(x) for all x, so f*g is the function that takes x to f(x)*g(x)).
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K