Understanding the Derivative of sin^2x: Common Mistakes and Clarifications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the common mistakes made when differentiating the function g(x) = sin(2x) and comparing it to f(x) = sin(x). The key error identified is the assumption that two functions crossing at a point implies their derivatives are equal at that point. The example provided illustrates that while f(60) = g(30), it does not follow that f'(60) = g'(30), leading to the incorrect conclusion that cos(60) = 2cos(60). The importance of recognizing extraneous solutions in algebraic manipulations is also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, specifically differentiation.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their derivatives.
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation and solving equations.
  • Awareness of extraneous solutions in mathematical equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differentiation of trigonometric functions, focusing on the chain rule.
  • Learn about the concept of extraneous solutions in algebraic equations.
  • Explore the implications of function intersections on their derivatives.
  • Practice solving equations that involve factoring and identifying all possible solutions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and algebra, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of function behavior and differentiation.

Nerd
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Please tell me where this reasoning is wrong, because I know it is but I can't see how.
f(x) = sinx
f ' (x) = cosx
f(60) = sin 60
f ' (60) = cos 60

but

g(x) = sin 2x
g'(x) = 2 cos 2x
set x = 30
then: g(30) = sin 60
g'(x) = 2 cos 60

but

f(60) = g(30)
so f ' (60) = g'(30)
i.e cos 60 = 2 cos 60
thus: 1 = 2

WHY! HOW!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The fact that two functions cross at a particular point does not mean that their derivative is the same.

You could do the same thing with much simpler functions eg f(x)=x, g(x)=2x these cross at x=0 but they obviously don't have the same gradient.
 


Thank you. That is quite obvious, isn't it.
 


Try this one:

x=0
x+1=1
(x+1)(x+1)=1(x+1)
x^2+2x+1=x+1
x^2+x=0
x(x+1)=0
x+1=0
x=-1

?
 


darkside00 said:
Try this one:

x=0
x+1=1
(x+1)(x+1)=1(x+1)
x^2+2x+1=x+1
x^2+x=0
x(x+1)=0
x+1=0
x=-1

?

:wink: Ops!
 


Where did it go wrong algebraically?
 


darkside00 said:
Where did it go wrong algebraically?

I just told you! I boldfaced those parts.
 


Actually, you could just as easily say that at...

x(x+1) = 0

You could just as easily divide by (x+1) to get...

x = 0.

After all, the first equation in this post says that x is EITHER 0 or -1.

And we know that it's zero.
 


Char. Limit said:
Actually, you could just as easily say that at...

x(x+1) = 0

You could just as easily divide by (x+1) to get...

x = 0.

After all, the first equation in this post says that x is EITHER 0 or -1.

And we know that it's zero.

If you do that you might miss out a solution.

if ab=0, then either a=0 or b=0.

if you just divide by a, you'll get b=0 only.
 
  • #10


^What he said. Doing that causes a missing solution. By the end, you should get x= -1 or 0. However, -1 is an extraneous solution. Therefore, you're stuck with x=0. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraneous_solution if you're confused.
 
  • #11


Yeah, I know that...

My point was that he missed a solution.
 
  • #12


Moderator's note:

Please keep on topic with the thread. New topics should be started in a new thread.

(See post #1 if you don't know what the topic of this thread is.)
[/color]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K