Understanding the Integration of exp(-t²) with a Change of Variable

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heresy42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function exp(-t²) and the implications of changing variables in the integral, particularly using the substitution u = t². Participants explore the correctness of the integration limits and the validity of the change of variable.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant computes the integral of exp(-t²) and relates it to the error function, concluding it equals √π.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of splitting the integral from -∞ to ∞ into two parts and taking limits, suggesting that standard integration rules may not apply.
  • A participant corrects the change of variable, stating that du should equal 2t dt instead of 2 dt.
  • Concerns are raised about the integration limits when substituting u = t², as u cannot take negative values while the limits are from -∞ to +∞.
  • A later reply acknowledges the issue with the change of variable and confirms that it applies only to positive values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the issues related to the change of variable and the limits of integration, but there is no consensus on the implications of these issues for the original integral.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations regarding the assumptions made about the variable substitution and the treatment of integration limits, which remain unresolved.

Heresy42
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I computed an integral that looks like erf(x) without problem: \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-t^2} dt = \int_{-\infty}^{0} e^{-t^2} dt + \int_{0}^{+\infty} e^{-t^2} dt = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} [-erf(-\infty)+erf(+\infty)] = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} [-(-1)+1] = \sqrt{\pi}.

However, what about the change of variable: u = t^2?
Hence: du = 2 dt and: \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-t^2} dt = \frac{1}{2} \int_{+\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-u} du = -\frac{1}{2} [e^{-u}]_{+\infty}^{+\infty} = 0.

I just want to be sure: the second integration doesn't make sense, because the lower and upper bounds are the same, right?

Thanks.

Regards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is exactly why one splits up an integral from -∞ to ∞ into two parts and takes the limit of each: the normal rules of integration don't necessarily apply.
 
Heresy42 said:
However, what about the change of variable: u = t^2?
Hence: du = 2 dt

No

du=2tdt
 
Indeed, my bad, thanks to both of you.
 
Heresy42 said:
However, what about the change of variable: u = t^2?
Hence: du = 2 dt and: \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-t^2} dt = \frac{1}{2} \int_{+\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-u} du = -\frac{1}{2} [e^{-u}]_{+\infty}^{+\infty} = 0.
You've already been told about the problem with du. Another problem here: u cannot be negative, yet you have the integrations limits being -∞ to +∞.
 
Dear D H,

Thanks for your reply. It's now clear to me that this change of variable is for positive values only.

Regards.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K