Understanding the Kronecker Delta Symbol: A_j Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Symbol
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the use of the Kronecker Delta symbol, specifically in the context of summation over indices in tensor notation. Participants emphasize that the summation is performed over the repeated index, which in this case is 'k', not 'j'. The correct interpretation leads to the conclusion that the expression δjkAk simplifies to Aj, as the Kronecker Delta equals 1 only when the indices match. Misunderstandings arise from the lack of a textbook reference, but the Einstein summation convention is crucial for proper comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and indices
  • Familiarity with the Einstein summation convention
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra, specifically matrix-vector multiplication
  • Experience with Kronecker Delta symbol usage
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Einstein summation convention in detail
  • Learn about Kronecker Delta properties and applications
  • Explore matrix-vector multiplication techniques
  • Review linear algebra textbooks focusing on tensor operations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, or engineering who are working with tensors and matrix operations, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of index notation and the Kronecker Delta symbol.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \delta _{jk} A_k \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \delta _{jk} A_k = \left( {\delta _{1,1} + \delta _{1,2} + \delta _{1,3} + \delta _{2,1} + \delta _{2,2} + \delta _{2,3} + \delta _{3,1} + \delta _{3,2} + \delta _{3,3} } \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \left( {1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1} \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = 3A_k \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

But the answer should be A_j. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I know, the sum is only over k, not j.
 
That's true, and you also need to recognize that A_k has different values for different terms in the sum.
 
and to further add, the delta will only be 1 when k=j in the sum.
 
Sorry, I don't understand your explanations. We don't have a textbook for this, only class notes. So I don't even know what "the sum is over k" means. Is it possible to work out the example? Thanks!
 
The sum is always only over a repeated index, the other indices are fixed. For example suppose A is a 2x2 matrix and x is a 2-vector:

A_{ij} x_j = \sum_{j=1}^2 A_{ij} x_j = A_{i1} x_1 + A_{i2} x_2
 
really your only problem is that you summed over j
 
tony873004 said:
Sorry, I don't understand your explanations. We don't have a textbook for this, only class notes. So I don't even know what "the sum is over k" means. Is it possible to work out the example? Thanks!

Hi tony873004! :smile:

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_summation_convention" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tony873004 said:
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \delta _{jk} A_k \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \delta _{jk} A_k = \left( {\delta _{1,1} + \delta _{1,2} + \delta _{1,3} + \delta _{2,1} + \delta _{2,2} + \delta _{2,3} + \delta _{3,1} + \delta _{3,2} + \delta _{3,3} } \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \left( {1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1} \right)A_k \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = 3A_k \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />
No. As others have said, the sum is over k, the repeated index, not i.
\delta_{ik}A_k= (A_{i1}A_1+ A_{i2}A_2+ A_{i3}A_3[/itex]<br /> for every i. That is<br /> \delta_{1k}A_k= A_{11}A_1+ A_{12}A_2+ A_{13}A_3= A_1<br /> \delta_{2k}A_k= A_{21}A_1+ A_{22}A_2+ A_{23}A_3= A_2<br /> \delta_{3k}A_3= A_{21}A_1+ A_{32}A_2+ A_{33}A_3= A_3<br /> That is, it is the vector &amp;lt;A_1, A_2, A_3&amp;gt; which can be written as A_i or A_j as they mean the same thing.<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> But the answer should be A_j. Where did I go wrong? </div> </div> </blockquote>
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K