jd12345
- 251
- 2
Why is energy proportional to frequency? Does this question have an answer or is it a fundamental thing that just happens?
Understanding the Relationship Between Energy and Frequency
- Context: Undergrad
- Thread starter jd12345
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Energy
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Fewmet
- 406
- 38
jd12345 said:
It is an experimental result. When you measure the maximum energy of ejected electrons in the photoelectric effect experiment and plot it against the frequency of the light that caused the emission (see example here), you get a straight line with a slope that is Planck's constant h. Applying the formula for a straight line and taking the binding energy of the electron into account, the equation of the line is E=h√.
- 25,837
- 258
hi jd12345! 
for light, it's a straightforward result from special relativity …
(i'll use unit with h = c = 1)
a photon moving in the x-direction with frequency eα and energy E is a wave, with phase 2πeα(t-x) and energy-momentum 4-vector (E,E,0,0)
a second observer moving in the x-direction with rapidity eβ will see the light red-shifted, with phase 2πeα-β(t-x) and energy-momentum 4-vector (Eeα-β,Eeα-β,0,0)
so energy divided by frequency is a constant for that particular photon
(there's probably a similar proof for electrons etc … would anyone else like to have a go at that?)
jd12345 said:
for light, it's a straightforward result from special relativity …
(i'll use unit with h = c = 1)
a photon moving in the x-direction with frequency eα and energy E is a wave, with phase 2πeα(t-x) and energy-momentum 4-vector (E,E,0,0)
a second observer moving in the x-direction with rapidity eβ will see the light red-shifted, with phase 2πeα-β(t-x) and energy-momentum 4-vector (Eeα-β,Eeα-β,0,0)
so energy divided by frequency is a constant for that particular photon
(there's probably a similar proof for electrons etc … would anyone else like to have a go at that?)