Understanding the stress-energy tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the stress-energy tensor, specifically the interpretation of the component T^(12), which represents the flux of the x-component of momentum in the y-direction. It clarifies that this is indicative of shear stress, where forces in one direction can affect momentum in another. The conversation also highlights the Maxwell stress tensor as a critical aspect of the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor, emphasizing its relevance in both non-relativistic and relativistic contexts. Key calculations for momentum flux through a membrane are provided, illustrating the relationship between particle density, velocity, and momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and components, particularly in physics.
  • Familiarity with shear stress concepts in fluid dynamics.
  • Knowledge of the Maxwell stress tensor and its applications.
  • Basic principles of relativistic and non-relativistic momentum.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Maxwell stress tensor in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the implications of shear stress in fluid dynamics and material science.
  • Learn about the Cauchy stress tensor and its role in continuum mechanics.
  • Investigate relativistic momentum and energy transformations in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying mechanics, electromagnetism, and continuum mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to deepen their understanding of stress-energy tensors and their applications in various fields.

Higgsono
Messages
93
Reaction score
4
I have trouble understanding some terms in the stress-energy-tensor. For instance T^(12) stands for the flux of the x-component of momentum in the y-direction. But what does it means for the x-component of momentum to flow in the y direction? Since momentum is a vector should't the x-component always point in the x-direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Higgsono said:
But what does it means for the x-component of momentum to flow in the y direction? Since momentum is a vector should't the x-component always point in the x-direction?
This is a shear stress. In a shear stress you have a force in the x direction on a face which is normal to the y direction. The x component of the force does always point in the x direction, but it can cross a face which is normal to the y direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Dale said:
This is a shear stress. In a shear stress you have a force in the x direction on a face which is normal to the y direction. The x component of the force does always point in the x direction, but it can cross a face which is normal to the y direction.

So what does this mean for say an electromagnetic wave propagating through vacuum or a medium?
 
Higgsono said:
I have trouble understanding some terms in the stress-energy-tensor. For instance T^(12) stands for the flux of the x-component of momentum in the y-direction. But what does it means for the x-component of momentum to flow in the y direction? Since momentum is a vector should't the x-component always point in the x-direction?

In 3 dimensions, imagine that you have lots of particles moving around. You want to compute the flux of y-momentum in the x-direction. The way you do it is to consider a membrane that is set up parallel to the y-z plane, as shown in the figure. Let ##\Delta \overrightarrow{P}## be the momentum that passes through the membrane from left to right during a small time interval ##\Delta t##. The momentum flux in the x-direction will then be: ##\frac{\Delta \overrightarrow{P}}{A \Delta t}## (change in momentum per unit area per unit time).

So how do we calculate ##\Delta \overrightarrow{P}##? Well, in the simplest case, the particles are non-interacting. So the amount of momentum passing through the membrane is just the average momentum of each particle that passes through times the number of particles.

So we have: ##\Delta \overrightarrow{P} = \overrightarrow{P}_{av} \Delta N##

The number of particles that pass through the membrane during time ##\Delta t## is just:

##\Delta N = \rho V^x_{av} A \Delta t##

It's proportional to the area of the membrane, ##A##, the average velocity in the direction perpendicular to the membrane, ##(V^x)_{av}## and the number of particles per unit volume, ##\rho##, and the time ##\Delta t##. So putting it all together:

##\frac{\Delta \overrightarrow{P}}{A \Delta t} = \frac{\overrightarrow{P}_{av} \rho V^x_{av} A \Delta t}{A \delta t} = \overrightarrow{P}_{av} \rho V^x_{av}##

The flux of y-momentum in the x-direction would then be:

##P^y_{av} V^x_{av} \rho##

Nonrelativistically, ##P^y = m V^y##, so you have:

##T^{yx} = V^y_{av} V^x_{av} \rho_{m}## (where ##\rho_m## is ##m \rho##, the mass density, rather than the number density).

Relativistically, ##P^y = E/c^2 V^y## (where ##E## is the relativistic energy), so you have:

##T^{yx} = V^y_{av} V^x_{av} \rho_{E}/c^2## (where ##\rho_E## is ##E \rho##, the energy density, rather than the number density).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and vanhees71
stevendaryl said:
In 3 dimensions, imagine that you have lots of particles moving around. You want to compute the flux of y-momentum in the x-direction. The way you do it is to consider a membrane that is set up parallel to the y-z plane, as shown in the figure. Let ##\Delta \overrightarrow{P}## be the momentum that passes through the membrane from left to right during a small time interval ##\Delta t##. The momentum flux in the x-direction will then be: ##\frac{\Delta \overrightarrow{P}}{A \Delta t}## (change in momentum per unit area per unit time).

So how do we calculate ##\Delta \overrightarrow{P}##? Well, in the simplest case, the particles are non-interacting. So the amount of momentum passing through the membrane is just the average momentum of each particle that passes through times the number of particles.

So we have: ##\Delta \overrightarrow{P} = \overrightarrow{P}_{av} \Delta N##

The number of particles that pass through the membrane during time ##\Delta t## is just:

##\Delta N = \rho V^x_{av} A \Delta t##

It's proportional to the area of the membrane, ##A##, the average velocity in the direction perpendicular to the membrane, ##(V^x)_{av}## and the number of particles per unit volume, ##\rho##, and the time ##\Delta t##. So putting it all together:

##\frac{\Delta \overrightarrow{P}}{A \Delta t} = \frac{\overrightarrow{P}_{av} \rho V^x_{av} A \Delta t}{A \delta t} = \overrightarrow{P}_{av} \rho V^x_{av}##

The flux of y-momentum in the x-direction would then be:

##P^y_{av} V^x_{av} \rho##

Nonrelativistically, ##P^y = m V^y##, so you have:

##T^{yx} = V^y_{av} V^x_{av} \rho_{m}## (where ##\rho_m## is ##m \rho##, the mass density, rather than the number density).

Relativistically, ##P^y = E/c^2 V^y## (where ##E## is the relativistic energy), so you have:

##T^{yx} = V^y_{av} V^x_{av} \rho_{E}/c^2## (where ##\rho_E## is ##E \rho##, the energy density, rather than the number density).

Thanks, I think it made it clearer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
893
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
774
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K