A Understanding the Tetrad Formalism in General Relativity

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Higgsono
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    tetrad
  • #51
vanhees71 said:
It's also worth thinking about why the table about "Coordinate Conversions" is partially wrong (or at least sloppy)!
Oh, did I miss something? What do you think is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
What I meant is the sloppy formula for the polar angle in polar coordinates (and the other analogous cases too). First of all one must recall the domains of the coordinates. For polar coordinates a convenient choice is ##r \in (0,\infty)## and ##\varphi \in (-\pi,pi]##.

Then the correct formula for the angle in terms of the Cartesian coordinates is
$$\varphi=\arctan_2(y,x)=\text{sign} \; y \arccos \left (\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}} \right).$$
 

Similar threads

Back
Top