MHB Understanding Uniform Random Variables: Comparing $X$ and $Y = 1-X$

Francobati
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Let $X\sim U(0,1)$ and define $Y=1-X$. What statement is TRUE?
(1): $F_{X}(u)\neq F_{Y}(u)$, for every $u\epsilon \left [ 0,1 \right ]$;
(2): $Y$ is not a rv;
(3): $E(X+Y)=2$;
(4): $Y\sim U(0,1)$;
(5): none of the remaining statements.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Francobati,

I am glad to find your interesting statistics questions! On MHB we always want you to give some kind of explanation of what you have tried. We are not a site that just "gives answers". So when you make a new thread it is best to always show what you have tried or what you know about the topic. This helps others see where you are stuck and how to best help.

So all of that said, what have you tried? What do you think about (3) for example?
 
Hello. Many thanks. You are absolutely right. I am studying probability, I am trying to read the theory, but unfortunately for the exercises and the applications I need somebody routes, I addresses, because the practice is very different from the theory and is at the same time useful to better understand the theory.
 
A good strategy is to check each statement separately. If $X \sim U(0,1)$ then it's distribution function $F_X$ is given by:
$$F_X(u) = \left \{ \begin{array}{lll} 0, \quad u <0 \\ u, \quad 0\leq u \leq 1 \\ 1, \quad u > 1 \end{array} \right.$$
(1): use the fact that $F_X(u) = \mathbb{P}(X \leq u)$. Therefore, $F_Y(u) = \mathbb{P}(Y \leq u) = P(1-X \leq u) = \ldots$.
(2): you can make use of statement (1)
(3): since $Y = 1-X$ it follows that $X+Y = \ldots$?
(4): again, make use of statement (1)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top