Unified gravity with electroweak through SU(2)xSU(2)xU(1)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electroweak Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proposal of unifying gravity with the electroweak force through a specific symmetry framework, namely SO(1,3)xU(1)=SU(2)xSU(2)xU(1). Participants explore the implications of local spontaneous symmetry breaking and the resulting mass generation for bosons.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a mathematical formulation involving a field Φ and its vacuum expectation value, suggesting that this leads to the emergence of three massive bosons, one massless photon, and two massless vector bosons related to gravitational fields.
  • Another participant questions the correctness of the initial claim and requests references to support the theory, indicating a need for validation within established frameworks.
  • Two participants assert ownership of the theory being discussed, which implies a personal interpretation rather than a widely accepted scientific model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correctness of the proposed theory, and the discussion remains unresolved with competing views and interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of references to established theories, potential dependence on specific definitions of symmetry, and the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps involved in the proposed framework.

fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Consider symmetry SO(1,3)xU(1)=SU(2)xSU(2)xU(1) and puting a local spontaneous broken symmetry:
Φ→exp(iαaτa)exp(iαaτa)exp(i(β/2))Φ
The field Φ acquires vacuum expectation value: <Φ>=(0,v).
Then ΔL=½(0 v)(gCμaτa+gAμaτa+
½g'Bμ)2(0 v)T.Then we find out three massive boson,one massless photon and two massless vector boson corresponding with 8 components of gravitation field hμν
Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
Is that correct?

Do you have a reference for this? PF does not allow discussion of personal theories.
 
This is my theory.
 
fxdung said:
This is my theory.

Then it's off topic here. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Why is the SU(3)xU(1) Group Essential for Dirac Fermions?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate What is the meaning of "excess" Goldstone bosons?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
High School What Are the Key Questions Surrounding SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) Symmetry Groups?
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
20K
Graduate Difference between SU(N)xU(1) and U(N)?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
16K
Graduate 5 rep of SU(5) under SU(3)XSU(2)XU(1)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Undergrad Electroweak symmetry and unbroken generators
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Undergrad The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Graduate Questions re electroweak de-unification during inflation
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Graduate Spinor indices on Yukawa coupling terms in electroweak sector
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Exploring the SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y Gauge Field Theory of Electroweak Interaction
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K