- #61
rewebster
- 877
- 2
Nusc said:
see post 53
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between theoretical physics and philosophy, particularly the assertion that theoretical physics has historically relied on philosophical and metaphysical foundations. Participants express skepticism about the relevance of philosophy to practical physics, with many arguing that it plays an insignificant role in their work. Richard Feynman's quote, likening the philosophy of science to ornithology for birds, is referenced to highlight this sentiment. Some contributors note that while philosophy may inform the creative process behind theories, it is rarely a concern during practical applications or data analysis. The conversation also touches on the historical context of physics as a branch of philosophy, suggesting that modern physicists often view philosophy as irrelevant to their scientific endeavors. Overall, the consensus leans toward the idea that while philosophical considerations may have shaped the development of physics, they do not significantly impact the day-to-day work of physicists today.