Is There a Way to Compute the Unintegrateable Function e^{-x^2}?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rock.freak667
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of the integral of the function \( e^{-x^2} \), particularly focusing on the Gaussian integral and its evaluation over the entire real line. Participants explore various methods for computing this integral, including power series expansion, double integrals, and polar coordinates, while also addressing the challenges associated with integrating non-elementary functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the integral \( \int e^{-x^2} dx \) cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions, raising the question of how the definite integral \( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx \) equals \( \sqrt{\pi} \).
  • One participant suggests that expanding \( e^{-x^2} \) as a power series or using double integrals could be methods for computing the integral, although they admit to not fully understanding double integrals yet.
  • Another participant presents a detailed approach using double integrals, showing the steps involved in transforming the product of two integrals into a double integral and converting to polar coordinates.
  • Some participants express confusion about the double integral method, indicating a lack of familiarity with the technique.
  • A participant references a Wikipedia article on the Gaussian integral, suggesting it provides a rigorous derivation of the integral.
  • Others mention that there are additional methods to solve the integral, including those learned in complex variables courses, and the necessity of Fubini's theorem to justify the manipulation of integrals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the integral \( \int e^{-x^2} dx \) cannot be expressed in elementary terms and that the Gaussian integral has a known value. However, there is no consensus on the best method for computing it, with multiple approaches and varying levels of understanding presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the steps involved in double integrals and the justification for manipulating integrals, indicating a need for further clarification on these mathematical concepts.

rock.freak667
Homework Helper
Messages
6,221
Reaction score
31
Consider

\int e^{-x^2} dxif that can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions, how did they compute

\int ^{\infty} _{- \infty} e^{-x^2} dx =\sqrt{\pi}
(I think I have the limits wrong, but I know it has \infty as the upper or lower limit)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rock.freak667 said:
Consider

\int e^{-x^2} dx


if that can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions, how did they compute

\int ^{\infty} _{\infty} e^{-x^2} dx =\sqrt{\pi}
well, one way of doing so is i guess expanding e^{-x^{2}} as a power series, using taylor series. But i also think one can compute it using double integrals. I have just heard about this though, since i have no idea how to deal with double integrals yet!
 
I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2}dx
I^2 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2} dx\times \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-y^2}dy

I^2 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-(x^2+y^2)}dxdy
I^2 = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-(r^2)}rdrd\theta
I^2 = \pi - \pi e^{-\infty}
 
Last edited:
FrogPad said:
I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2}dx
I^2 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-x^2} dx\times \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-y^2}dy

I^2 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-(x^2+y^2)}dxdy
I^2 = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-(r^2)}rdrd\theta
I^2 = \pi - \pi e^{-\infty}

THis looks cute, although i do not understand a damn thing what u did! I mean i haven't yet dealt with double integrals!
 
This is the Gaussian integral. The wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integral" ) on this integral goes over the derivation of this integral and does a rigorous job (check out the "careful" proof of the identity).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sutupidmath said:
THis looks cute, although i do not understand a damn thing what u did! I mean i haven't yet dealt with double integrals!

EDIT: Note: Read the article D H posted, and not the gibberish below.

Honestly, I can't believe I remembered how to do it. I've seen it a couple of times in class. To me it is, a trick.

But here's the jist of it. That x^2 looks like a beast, and integrating from -infinity to infinity seems like a problem.

We know that if we multiply two exponentials e^u*e^y we get e^(u+y). So when we multiply the two integrals together and get x^2+y^2 this should be screaming, convert me into polar coordinates.

So we multiply the two integrals together, and convert the x^2+y^2 into r^2.

First though, why is that even possible? Well remember that when you integrate with "numbers" you get a number. What I mean by this is the following.

If we integrate \int_0^1 x dx we get a number right? What about when we integrate \int_0^u x dx? Well the second case returns a function dependent on u.

So in the first case, \int_0^1 x dx, why not just call this a number, how about I. So this makes sense to be able to multiply two numbers together, eg. I\timesI = \int_0^1 x dx \times \int_0^1 x dx [/tex]. Think about why we can &quot;push&quot; them together. <br /> <br /> I think the most interesting part about it, was changing to polar coordinates. The part where we change from sweeping out -infinity to infinity in the x and y direction in rectangular coordinates to sweeping out all values by rotating from 0 to 2pi and extending the &quot;arm&quot; from 0 to infinity.
 
Last edited:
There are other ways to solve the above as well. You will learn these if you take a course in complex variables.
 
You will also need Fubini's theorem in order to justify that you may in this case convert the product of two integrals into a double integral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K