MHB Unique Area of Triangle Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unique area of a triangle formula, which is confirmed to be correct. The proof relies on linear algebra concepts, specifically determinants. Participants express admiration for the formula's utility and elegance. There is a mention of varying levels of understanding among contributors regarding linear algebra. Overall, the conversation highlights the formula's significance and the mathematical concepts involved in its proof.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
I think the following formula is so cool.

View attachment 7498
 

Attachments

  • MathMagic171110_3.png
    MathMagic171110_3.png
    17.2 KB · Views: 108
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is correct. The proof involves some linear algebra, and, in particular, determinants. What is your background in that topic ?
 
castor28 said:
Yes, it is correct. The proof involves some linear algebra, and, in particular, determinants. What is your background in that topic ?

My math background is not deep enough to understand linear algebra, much less proof at that level. This formula is so useful and cool.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top