MHB Unique Factorization Domain? Nature of Q_Z[x] - 2

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Let \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] denote the set of polynomials with rational coefficients and integer constant terms.

Prove that the only two units in \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] are 1 and -1.

Help with this exercise would be appreciated.

My initial thoughts on this exercise are as follows:

1 and -1 are the units of $$ \mathbb{Z} $$. Further the constant terms of the polynomials are from $$ \mathbb{Z} $$ and so I suspect the units of \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] are thus 1 and -1 - but this is not a rigorous proof - indeed it is extremely vague!

Can someone help with a rigorous formulation of these thoughts into a formal proof.

I suspect that such a proof would start as follows:

Units of \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] would be those p(x) and q(x) such that

p(x)q(x) = 1

can you just assert now that the only possible polynomials in \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] would be 1 and -1 - what reason would you give - is it obvious?

Hope someone can clarify.

Peter

[This exercise is also posted on MHF]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's obvious.
In fact, you can't define the invers of a non-constant polynomial. How would you for example define the invers polynomial of $x^2-1$? Hence, the only invertible polynomials are the constant polynomials. Since the constant polynomials are integers and $-1$ and $1$ are the only invertible integers they are the only units in the set $\mathbb{Q}_{\mathbb{Z}}[X]$
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top