MHB Unique Factorization Domain? Nature of Q_Z[x] - 2

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Let \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] denote the set of polynomials with rational coefficients and integer constant terms.

Prove that the only two units in \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] are 1 and -1.

Help with this exercise would be appreciated.

My initial thoughts on this exercise are as follows:

1 and -1 are the units of $$ \mathbb{Z} $$. Further the constant terms of the polynomials are from $$ \mathbb{Z} $$ and so I suspect the units of \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] are thus 1 and -1 - but this is not a rigorous proof - indeed it is extremely vague!

Can someone help with a rigorous formulation of these thoughts into a formal proof.

I suspect that such a proof would start as follows:

Units of \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] would be those p(x) and q(x) such that

p(x)q(x) = 1

can you just assert now that the only possible polynomials in \mathbb{Q}_\mathbb{Z}[x] would be 1 and -1 - what reason would you give - is it obvious?

Hope someone can clarify.

Peter

[This exercise is also posted on MHF]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's obvious.
In fact, you can't define the invers of a non-constant polynomial. How would you for example define the invers polynomial of $x^2-1$? Hence, the only invertible polynomials are the constant polynomials. Since the constant polynomials are integers and $-1$ and $1$ are the only invertible integers they are the only units in the set $\mathbb{Q}_{\mathbb{Z}}[X]$
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...
Back
Top