Unit Error in Oppenheimer-Snyder 1939 Paper?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RogueBanana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Paper Unit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
RogueBanana
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there an error, perhaps typographical, in the famous 1939 Oppenheimer-Snyder paper "On Continued Gravitational Contraction" (Phys Rev v56 Sept 1, 1956 pp 455-459)?

Do the units balance in equation 37? The last term inside the last parantheses

##\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^2}##

where ##r_0##, ##\tau## and ##R_b## all have units of length (or time), isn't unitless, as it should be to be subtracted from 1.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the curly brackets means that the 2nd line of (37) is still under the logarithm. The factor

$$\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^2}$$

should be

$$\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^{3/2}}.$$

This term comes from the ##R_b r/(r_0 R)## term in the expression for ##M(y)## in (32). We are to set ##R=R_b## and use (27) for ##r##, which gives

$$ \frac{ R_b r}{r_0 R_b} = \frac{ 1}{r_0 } \left( R_b^{3/2} - \frac{3}{2} r_0^{1/2}\tau \right)^{2/3} = \frac{ R_b}{r_0 } \left( 1- \frac{3r_0^{1/2}\tau}{2 R_b^{3/2}} \right)^{2/3}.$$