Unit Error in Oppenheimer-Snyder 1939 Paper?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RogueBanana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Paper Unit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion identifies a potential typographical error in equation 37 of the Oppenheimer-Snyder 1939 paper "On Continued Gravitational Contraction." Specifically, the term ##\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^2}## is incorrectly presented as it does not yield a unitless result, which is necessary for subtraction from 1. The correct formulation should be ##\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^{3/2}}##, aligning with the units of length and time for ##r_0##, ##\tau##, and ##R_b##. This correction is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the mathematical expressions in the paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational contraction concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation in physics
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis
  • Basic grasp of Oppenheimer-Snyder's work and its significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Oppenheimer-Snyder 1939 paper for context and implications of the error
  • Study dimensional analysis techniques in theoretical physics
  • Examine the derivation of equation 37 and its relevance to gravitational theories
  • Explore the impact of typographical errors in scientific literature
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in gravitational theory, and students studying the Oppenheimer-Snyder model will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in mathematical accuracy in theoretical physics.

RogueBanana
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is there an error, perhaps typographical, in the famous 1939 Oppenheimer-Snyder paper "On Continued Gravitational Contraction" (Phys Rev v56 Sept 1, 1956 pp 455-459)?

Do the units balance in equation 37? The last term inside the last parantheses

##\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^2}##

where ##r_0##, ##\tau## and ##R_b## all have units of length (or time), isn't unitless, as it should be to be subtracted from 1.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the curly brackets means that the 2nd line of (37) is still under the logarithm. The factor

$$\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^2}$$

should be

$$\frac{3r_0^{1/2} \tau}{2R_b^{3/2}}.$$

This term comes from the ##R_b r/(r_0 R)## term in the expression for ##M(y)## in (32). We are to set ##R=R_b## and use (27) for ##r##, which gives

$$ \frac{ R_b r}{r_0 R_b} = \frac{ 1}{r_0 } \left( R_b^{3/2} - \frac{3}{2} r_0^{1/2}\tau \right)^{2/3} = \frac{ R_b}{r_0 } \left( 1- \frac{3r_0^{1/2}\tau}{2 R_b^{3/2}} \right)^{2/3}.$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K