Can a Non-Diagonal Hermitian Matrix be Diagonalized Using Unitary Matrix?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the diagonalization of non-diagonal Hermitian matrices using unitary matrices. Participants explore whether it is possible to diagonalize a Hermitian matrix that is not diagonal by employing a unitary matrix that does not consist solely of the eigenvectors of the Hermitian matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that every Hermitian matrix is unitary diagonalizable, questioning if a non-diagonal Hermitian matrix can be diagonalized with a unitary matrix that is not formed from its eigenvectors.
  • One participant suggests that the identity matrix may be a trivial case but is challenged on the grounds that it is indeed diagonal.
  • A specific example is proposed involving a 2x2 matrix where the unitary matrix is defined with parameters that produce a non-diagonal Hermitian matrix from a diagonal one.
  • Concerns are raised about the eigenvalues of the unitary matrix and their implications for the diagonalization process, with suggestions that eigenvalues can take on values other than ±1.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for clarity in specifying the matrices involved in the diagonalization process, particularly the relationships between the Hermitian matrix, the unitary matrix, and the diagonal matrix.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific conditions under which a non-diagonal Hermitian matrix can be diagonalized by a unitary matrix that is not composed of its eigenvectors. There is no consensus on the feasibility of this diagonalization or the implications of the eigenvalues involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specifying the matrices involved and the conditions under which the diagonalization is considered, highlighting potential dependencies on definitions and assumptions regarding eigenvalues.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Every hermitian matrix is unitary diagonalizable. My question is it possible in some particular case to take hermitian matrix ##A## that is not diagonal and diagonalize it
UAU=D
but if ##U## is not matrix that consists of eigenvectors of matrix ##A##. ##D## is diagonal matrix.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U=U^{-1}
I am not sure of such a specific case.
 
Yes here I am talking about case ##U=U^{-1}##. I am also not sure. But for me it is interesting.
 
As an example in 2X2 marix
U=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> k &amp; \alpha \\<br /> \beta &amp; -k \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
where
\alpha \beta = 1-k^2
would produce non diagonal matrix A from diagonal matrix D which has two different eigenvalues with A=UDU.
 
Last edited:
You can give me 2x2 example. But specify ##A##, ##U## and ##D##. Because ##U## still possibly can be formed of eigenvectors of ##A## in your example of ##U##.
 
Eingenvalues of U are ##\pm 1##. You can pick up the cases that eigenvalues of D and A are not 1 nor -1 for your purpose.
 
jedishrfu said:
is the identity m
No, because the identity matrix is diagonal.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Eingenvalues of U are ##\pm 1##. You can pick up the cases that eigenvalues of D and A are not 1 nor -1 for your purpose.
Why? Eigenvalue can be for instance ##i##.
 
  • #10
My #7 talks abot U of post #5. There for U \lambda^2 =1
UDU=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> k &amp; \alpha \\<br /> \beta &amp; -k \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> d_1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; d_2 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> k &amp; \alpha \\<br /> \beta &amp; -k \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> d_2+(d_1-d_2)k^2 &amp; k\alpha (d_1-d_2) \\<br /> k \beta (d_1-d_2) &amp; d_1-(d_1-d_2)k^2 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> =A
, and
d_1,d_2 \neq -1,1
to satisfy your further condition.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K