Universal Gravitation and rockets

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the motion of a small rocket launched vertically, focusing on its acceleration, maximum speed, and altitude. The context includes the application of kinematics and the law of universal gravitation, with participants exploring the dynamics of the rocket's ascent and the effects of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the two phases of the rocket's motion: the powered ascent and the subsequent free fall. There are attempts to calculate the time of engine firing and the height at cutoff using kinematic equations. Questions arise regarding the assumption of constant gravitational acceleration versus the inverse square law.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, suggesting the use of different kinematic equations and emphasizing the need to consider the changing acceleration during the rocket's ascent. There is acknowledgment of the complexity in determining the acceleration during the powered phase and the transition to free fall.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of calculating the rocket's acceleration and height at engine cutoff, as well as the implications of assuming uniform gravity versus a variable gravitational force. The discussion reflects the constraints of the problem as posed in a homework context, with specific values and conditions provided.

MellowOne
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Universal Gravitation

Homework Statement


A small rocket is launched vertically, attaining a maximum speed at burnout of 1.0x10^2 m/s and thereafter coasting straight up to a maximum altitude of 1519 m. Assuming the rocket accelerated uniformly while the engine was on, how long did it fire and how high was it at engine cutoff? Ignore air friction


Homework Equations


Kinematics and Law of universal gravity equation


The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the time could be solved by using the 1st kinematics where Vf = 1.0 x 10^2m/s and Vi = 0m/s and a = 9.8m/s^2. The time I found was 10.2041s which isn't correct. Is that because gravity would change during the time the rocket reaches burnout? If so, how would I go about solving this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two parts to the rocket's motion. The time that was computed corresponds to which part?
 
The time I found was the time of acceleration. It asks how long it "fired" so I assumed that the final velocity was what the question had and acceleration was 9.8m/s^2 and used the first kinematics Vf = vi +a(delta t)
 
Why should the accn of the rocket be 9.8 MKS when the engines are on? Find the accn 'a' directly by the formula relating Vi, Vf and assuming h for the height gained. After that, it was in free fall, with initial velo Vf.

Are you supposed to assume uniform g or an inverse square law?
 
Using the 3rd kinematics accn = 13.166m/s^2 which I assume would be the acceleration of the rocket. So by subtracting 9.8m/s^2 for grav, the acceleration became 3.36656m/s^2.
I then used the 3rd kinematics again but this time solving for delta y which gave me 14.852m but it was wrong.
 
As posted here there are two parts in the rocket's motion. First the one with the engines on and the second one without them. In the first part the acceleration of the rocket must be used in the equations, however it is still unknown as is the height and the time after lift-off when the engines stop working. So it will become difficult to start from this. The second part of the rocket's motion contains however all the data you need for describing this part. The formula's you need are the ones of a linear motion under an acceleration, in this case g. Before starting to do the calculations, make a nice sketch and draw the axes system, X (the Earth's surface) in the horizontal direction and Y pointing upwards. Now you know that the acceleration of the rocket is -g because it is pointing downwards and no other acceleration is at hand here because of the engines not working. This is equal to [tex]\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex] and to [tex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/tex]. Use this to obtain the necessary formula's. Take care of the boundary conditions, we are working on the second part and these are thus time t=0 (from here we start timing the second part) [tex]v_0=v_f=100\frac{m}{s}[/tex] and [tex]h_0=?[/tex] (unknown). From the formula of the velocities you can obtain the time (10.204s) from shutdown of the engines to it's final height. Knowing this and the formula for the height you can obtain the height (1008.8m) at which the engines stopped. The second part is now completely known.

Secondly the lift-off part. In case you are not familiar with potential and kinetic energy, I will give you a tip on how to look for an equation without time, relating acceleration, velocity and height. Consider:

[tex]a=\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]

Multiplying the left and right hand side with the same number is allowed, so we know that:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dt}=v[/tex]

Multiplying these gives:

[tex]a \cdot \frac{dy}{dt}=v \cdot \frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]

Leaving out the dt gives:

[tex]a \cdot dy=v \cdot dv[/tex]

Integrating this gives and using the symbols from above:

[tex](a_{rocket}-g) \cdot y=\frac{1}{2}(v_f^2-v_0^2)[/tex]

You know that [tex]v_0=0[/tex], and a (14.756m/s^2) is the only unknown. Solve for this. Then you should be able to obtain the time (20.176s) from lift-off to shutdown of the engines and the height (1008.8m) at which this occurs, which should be the same as the one from the beginning.
 
Thanks a lot coomast, I got it. I started what you said to do in the first part to find the distance it traveled at 100m/s but I missed something in there. Thanks for all the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
25K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K