What is the Maximum Altitude of a Model Rocket?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum altitude of a model rocket launched at a 45-degree angle, with specific parameters including final velocity, mass, and burn time. Participants are exploring the dynamics involved in the rocket's ascent and the equations governing its motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss integrating the rocket equation to find height, questioning the validity of different approaches and results. There are inquiries about the initial differential equations used for acceleration and the relationship between velocity, position, and mass over time.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of various methods to derive the rocket's altitude, with participants providing insights into the integration process and the implications of mass as a function of time. Some participants suggest replacing variables in equations to reconcile different results, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the assumptions that can be made about the rocket's motion. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of physics principles in their calculations.

Januz Johansen
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hello all, I have to determine the maximum height of a model rocket.
The rocket is launched at an 45 degree angle
The finale velocity is 15,69 m/s (v)
the extutevelocety is 14,23 m/s (c)
The total mass is 180 gram (m) or m0)
The emty mass is 52 grams (mf)
The mass pr sek is 0,45 kg/s (me)
And the total burntime is 0,28 sek (t)

Homework Equations


How can i calculate the height at burnout, (i know how to calculate the last part) or all in one?

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tryed intregrating the rocket equation (v(t)) to get s(t), so i can calulate it with phytagoras, i got the equation from v(t) to:
upload_2016-12-9_17-49-31.png

but i have looked around to see it it was right, and i found this equation:
upload_2016-12-9_17-58-14.png

they give me different results, who is right, or are we both wrong?

Hope you can help
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-12-9_17-49-25.png
    upload_2016-12-9_17-49-25.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you use as your initial differential equation for the acceleration of the rocket ##(\frac {d^2x} {dt^2})##?
 
TJGilb said:
What did you use as your initial differential equation for the acceleration of the rocket (##\frac {d^2x} {dt^2}##)? Or did you start with velocity (##\frac {dx} {dt}##)?
Hello, Yes sorry forgot, i used the velocity
upload_2016-12-9_18-42-29.png
so dx/dt, and its the same for the example i found
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-12-9_18-41-27.png
    upload_2016-12-9_18-41-27.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 526
So you know velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time, but in your solution it looks like you integrated with respect to mass (or maybe turned time into a function of mass), am I correct?
 
TJGilb said:
So you know velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time, but in your solution it looks like you integrated with respect to mass (or maybe turned time into a function of mass), am I correct?
I see in the examble i found he rewrite the equation to
upload_2016-12-9_18-59-26.png

and do this
upload_2016-12-9_19-0-6.png

but will this make the difference, it should be the same (m(t) =mf at the burnout time, because there are no more fuel right?)
 
When deriving the rocket equation, you start with the sum of forces to get ##\sum F =thrust-mg=ma## which can be rewritten as ##\frac {d^2x} {dt^2} = \frac {thrust-mg} m##. But since mass is a function of time in rockets, it can be replaced by ##\frac {d^2x} {dt^2} = \frac {thrust-{m(t)}g} {m(t)}##. For the record thrust is the mass flow rate multiplied by the exhaust velocity.

It actually looks like they simplify it a little by not including the initial mass in their equation for m(t). But if you use the correct mass equation of ##m(t)=m_0-mfr*t## then solve for time you'd get ##t= \frac {m(t)-m_0} {mfr}## where the mfr is the mass flow rate. If you replaced every value of t with that "stuff" and integrated with respect to it, that could work. But that would be really overcomplicating the integration.
 
Or going off what they use for m(t) you could integrate with to ##\frac {m(t)} {-m_e}## after plugging that into every t value.
 
Last edited:
I was actually looking at what you got a bit closer, and it might be good. I'd recommend replacing every t in their equation with your function for m(t), simplifying, and see if it matches what you got.
 
TJGilb said:
I was actually looking at what you got a bit closer, and it might be good. I'd recommend replacing every t in their equation with your function for m(t), simplifying, and see if it matches what you got.
Ok thank you. I will try that, and make an update post (if you have a little time later) :D
 
  • #10
TJGilb said:
I was actually looking at what you got a bit closer, and it might be good. I'd recommend replacing every t in their equation with your function for m(t), simplifying, and see if it matches what you got.
Sorry i said m(t)=-me*t but it's m(t)=m0-me*t
My mistake
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K