Universe with only e+ , e- , photons, and gravitation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the theoretical possibility of a universe composed solely of positrons, electrons, photons, and gravitational interactions. Participants consider the implications of such a universe on energy density, stability, and cosmological behavior, as well as connections to broader theories like String Theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a universe with only charged particles and photons could be stable and long-lived, suggesting the possibility of fine-tuning conditions.
  • Another participant proposes that the energy density in the fields of charged particles could be roughly twice that of the electromagnetic field in the early universe.
  • A participant mentions that a Lagrangian for quantum electrodynamics could be formulated for such a universe, allowing for predictions in certain limits.
  • There is a suggestion that the cosmology of this hypothetical universe could be analyzed by mimicking conventional cosmological calculations.
  • One participant introduces the concept of positronium and speculates on the potential for more complex temporary structures under specific conditions.
  • Another participant notes that while electrons exist as fundamental particles, protons are composites and questions the existence of other particles in this simplified universe.
  • A follow-up question is raised regarding the flexibility of String Theory to accommodate such a simplified universe model, suggesting it might be easier to solve than more complex models.
  • A reference to a specific string theory model related to quantum electrodynamics is provided, indicating a connection to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the feasibility and implications of a universe with only positrons, electrons, and photons, with no consensus reached on the stability or characteristics of such a universe. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of energy density and the potential for complex structures.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the proposed universe, dependence on theoretical frameworks like quantum electrodynamics and String Theory, and the lack of consensus on the existence and behavior of particles beyond electrons and positrons.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
Universe with only "e+", "e-", photons, and gravitation?

In theory could we have a universe with only electrically charged spin 1/2 particles and antiparticles of mass m and electrical charge e and that interacted only gravitationally and electromagnetically?

If so could we fine tune things so that such a universe was long lived and closed?

In the early phase of such a universe would there be roughly twice the energy density in the fields of the charged particles as in the electromagnetic field?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


maybe this is a bit linked to my thread "what is strong gravity". but what is your idea.
 


qsa said:
maybe this is a bit linked to my thread "what is strong gravity". but what is your idea.

I'm thinking (I hope %^) that the answer to my first question is yes. If we get some deeper "Theory of Everything" then I'm guessing the answer to my first question might go either way.
 


Odd questions... Certainly you could write down a Lagrangian for quantum electrodynamics (with just one species of particle, as you describe) coupled to gravity, and you could calculate what this Lagrangian predicts in certain limits. You could also figure out the cosmology for such a universe, by imitating all the calculations performed in conventional cosmology, e.g. thermodynamics of the early universe. But your fictitious universe will be a lot simpler than the real one, e.g. it contains no atoms.
 


We would still have positronium %^)

And if we made the mass m greater and e smaller then positronium might last long enough for more complicated temporary "atoms"? Under the right conditions two positively charged particles might be temporarily bound to two negatively charged anti-particles?

Thanks for your replies!
 


Even standerd physics says only electrons exist. Protons are composites. But no agreed on confinment theory exists as far as i know. Almost all others have short life and are produced as part of interaction.
 


mitchell porter said:
Odd questions... Certainly you could write down a Lagrangian for quantum electrodynamics (with just one species of particle, as you describe) coupled to gravity, and you could calculate what this Lagrangian predicts in certain limits. You could also figure out the cosmology for such a universe, by imitating all the calculations performed in conventional cosmology, e.g. thermodynamics of the early universe. But your fictitious universe will be a lot simpler than the real one, e.g. it contains no atoms.

So I will take that as a yes, thank you %^)

The follow up question relates to String Theory. Is String Theory "flexible" enough so that it could also include such a simple universe? If so wouldn't such a toy model be easier to solve then trying include all fields?

Thanks for any help!
 


http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403247 contains a string theory model for quantum electrodynamics in four dimensions. It's Type IIB string theory with a space-filling D9-brane and another space-filling anti-D9-brane, and then you have a "probe" D3-brane interacting with that background. See table 2 and the bottom of page 5 for where the photon and electron come from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K