MHB Unknown's question at Yahoo Answers regarding the perimeter of a rectangle

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves finding the dimensions of a rectangle with consecutive odd integer lengths that yield a perimeter of at least 35 cm. By defining the lengths as 2n-1 and 2n+1, the perimeter formula simplifies to P = 8n. Setting the inequality 8n ≥ 35 leads to n being at least 5, resulting in dimensions of 9 cm and 11 cm for the rectangle. This configuration provides a perimeter of 40 cm, while the next smallest odd integers yield a perimeter of only 32 cm. Thus, the smallest rectangle meeting the criteria has dimensions of 9 cm and 11 cm.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

The dimensions of a rectangle are consecutive odd integers.

Find the smallest such rectangle with a perimeter of at least 35 cm.

Can you explain please.
It includes inequalities I think..

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: unknown's question at Yahoo! Answers regarding the perimeter of a rectangle

Hello unknown,

Let's let one pair of parallel sides, the smaller pair have length $2n-1$ and the other pair, the larger pair, have length $2n+1$, where $n$ is a natural number. We know they are both odd, because $2n$ must be even, and so adding/subtracting $1$ from an even number results in an odd number. We know they are consecutive odd numbers because their difference is $2$:

$$(2n+1)-(2n-1)=2n+1-2n+1=2$$

So, let's draw a diagram of our rectangle:

View attachment 1352

We see the perimeter $P$, which is the sum of the lengths of the four sides is:

$$P=(2n+1)+(2n-1)+(2n+1)+(2n-1)=8n$$

We are told that this perimeter must be at least 35 (measures in cm), so we may write:

$$8n\ge35$$

Dividing through by $8$, we find:

$$n\ge\frac{35}{8}=4+\frac{3}{8}$$

Since $n$ is a natural number (a positive integer), we may then conclude we must have:

$$n=5$$

And so the two larger sides have length:

$$2(5)+1=11$$

And the smaller sides have length:

$$2(5)-1=9$$

This gives us a perimeter of $40\text{ cm}$. If we take the next smallest pair of consecutive integers, namely $7$ and $9$, we find the perimeter would be $32\text{ cm}$.
 

Attachments

  • unknownrect.jpg
    unknownrect.jpg
    3.1 KB · Views: 94
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top