hitssquad
- 926
- 0
Nature abides.loseyourname said:Unless you advocate
Nature abides.loseyourname said:Unless you advocate
hitssquad said:Nature abides.
Technology. Nature does not care what you do with it.loseyourname said:Nature abides what?hitssquad said:Priests and politicians demand that technology (the fruit of science) be helpful. Nature abides.
Currently, nature is longitudinally deselecting both populations and subpopulations with high g. This condition is known as dysgenics and its recent trends are documented in a recent book of the same name by Richard Lynn:Are you saying that our economy will be fine because nature will select out people with low intelligence?
There is currently a correlation worldwide and within most nations, but it is negative. Lynn, above, has numbers documenting the trend. Jensen, quoting from Vining, also has some numbers:Now you'll need to show me some correlation between SES and reproductive success.
The real problem is that the large number of persons with IQ's less than 30 points above the average are having fewer children than the equally large number of persons with IQ's less than 30 points below the average. Together, these two groups are almost 96% of the population. 70% of the population have IQ's between 85 and 115. Vining's study in 1978 found the highest white birthrates in women with IQ's of 86-100, or less than 1 SD below the mean (see Jensen, _g factor_, p. 485). Black women were most fertile with IQ's of 71 and below, or more than 1 SD below the Afro-American mean. Unfortunately, I haven't run across similar data for men, but it is commonly said that the poorest men have the least reproductive success, and presumably this population includes the great majority of the mildly retarded. Criminals are reported to have exceptionally high birthrates, but criminals tend to be of moderately low intelligence; they are typically not morons.
~Alypius
hitssquad said:Technology. Nature does not care what you do with it.
Currently, nature is longitudinally deselecting both populations and subpopulations with high g. This condition is known as dysgenics and its recent trends are documented in a recent book of the same name by Richard Lynn:
http://www.eugenics.net/papers/lynnrev.html
The economy of the United States may suffer.
"To endure or bear patiently," as in the book Earth Abides by George R. Stewart. You said that that technology cannot be useful "unless you advocate [particular avenue x]." Nature does not care what you do with technology.loseyourname said:Now what definition of the word "abide" are you using?hitssquad said:Technology. Nature does not care what you do with it.
The findings of science are fruits, employable technologies. The finding that IQ is the single most powerful explanatory variable in the world today in terms of differences between nations in per capita GDP constitutes a technology. You said that that technology cannot be useful "unless you advocate [particular avenue x]." But nature abides.And technology has what to do with the national IQ?
There has been a historic influx of settlers and immigrants with high IQs. This is called brain drain. (Apparently because of its liberal political atmosphere and liberal economics) the U.S. drained brains from other nations. Currently, and notoriously, Russia is having its brains drained out.There has been a constant influx of poverty since the inception of this nation, yet the economy has always improved.