Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Eraser - Help Needed!

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum eraser experiment, specifically the impact of polarization filters on the interference pattern produced by photons passing through two slits. When vertical and horizontal polarized lenses are placed over each slit, the interference pattern disappears, indicating that measurement affects the state of the photons. The introduction of a 50/50 45-degree lens allows the photons to exist in a superposition of states, restoring the interference pattern. The key misunderstanding lies in the interpretation of measurement and polarization states in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly superposition and polarization.
  • Familiarity with the double-slit experiment and its implications in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of polarization filters and their effects on light waves.
  • Basic grasp of quantum measurement theory and its role in determining particle states.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quantum eraser experiment in detail, focusing on the role of measurement in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the concept of superposition in quantum physics and its implications for particle behavior.
  • Research the effects of different polarization angles on interference patterns in light.
  • Examine the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics, particularly the wave function and its collapse.
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of light behavior and measurement in quantum theory.

palleon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new here, and not *really* a physics student, just a guy trying to wrap his head around science by reading lots of books! Stuck on a well known theory, which in my head does not make sense, and hoping someone can clarify...

Homework Statement



A quantum Eraser - this works by adding a vertical polarized lens over one slit of a "2-slit interference pattern creator" and a horizontal polarized lens over the other slit. When added, the interference pattern vanishes and just has one "clump". Replacing with a 50/50 45o lens to both slits, the interference pattern reappears.

The books all tell me this is because you can not measure the effect, and this experience attempts to do that, but by doing so, stops it working. The vertical lens only allows through a vertical particle and so on with the other.

Homework Equations



Surely all this means is that when the photon attempts to "go through both slits at the same time" it is either in a horizontal or vertical state, and so one of the lenses stops that (as it can't be in both states at once). When the 50/50 lens goes on, if the photon can go through one lens it can also go through the other at the same time.

The Attempt at a Solution



This says to me that its not a case of measuring it at all that stops it working, its just you can't put a square peg into a triangular hole.

As the entire book hinges on this "cant measure" rule, so far to me it all appears to be based on a misunderstanding... therefore the whole quantum thing is collapsing for me.

Please, what key part of this am I getting wrong?

Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the photon did obtain a V or H polarisation by going through either slit, then it takes on a path until the 45/135 degree polariser erases that polarisation. But then getting interference, you'd be changing a definite past.

I think the photon would be best described as a superposition of V and H polarisations after the slit (as would be indicated by QM). Only half of the photons fired towards the slit make it through, and then a subsequent 1/2 of those would make it through the 45 or 135 degree polariser.

The possibility of measuring a V or H polarisation after the photon obtains 45 or 135 degree polarisations is now zero, resulting in the fringe and anti-fringe interference patterns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K