MHB Unraveling the Mystery: Solving for Real Values in a Complex Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

Initially, I thought this is another boring high school mathematics problem, but when I started to work on it, I realized I was beaten by it, with equations in variables $a$, $b$, $p$ and $q$ to which I don't see a clear way to find the values for them.

Problem:

Find all real $p$, $q$, $a$ and $b$ such that we have $$(2x-1)^{20}-(ax+b)^{20}=(x^2+px+q)^{10}$$ for all $x$.

Attempt:

After expanding both sides of the equation using wolfram, I get

$$(1048576-a^{20})x^{20}-(10485760+20a^{19}b)x^{19}+(49807360-190a^{18}b^2)x^{18}+\cdots-(1140a^3b^{17}+9120)x^{3}$$
$$
+(-190a^2b^{18}+760)x^{2}-(20ab^{19}+40)x+1-b^{20}=x^{20}+10px^{19}+(10q^9+45p^2q^8)x^{2}+10pq^9x+q^{10}$$

And I ended up getting extremely messy equations where solving for the values for $a$, $b$, $p$ and $q$ seems impossible by equating the coefficient of $x^{20}$, $x^{19}$, $x^{18}$, $x^{3}$, $x^{2}$, $x$ and the constant...

Could anyone help me with this problem?

Thanks in advance.


 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Some solutions would be obtained by letting

$$a=2,b=-1$$

and finding the roots for

$$x^2+px+q=0$$
 
Because it is true for all x you can choose any value of x

setting x = 1/2 shall make 1st term = 0

we get

- (b+1/2a)^20 = (1/4 + 1/2p+ q) ^ 10

LHS <=0 and RHS >= 0 so both are 0

So b =- 1/2a and 1/2p + q + 1/4 = 0

So a = - 2b and 2p + 2q + 1 = 0

by putting suitable values of x you can proceed.
 
kaliprasad said:
Because it is true for all x you can choose any value of x

setting x = 1/2 shall make 1st term = 0

we get

- (b+1/2a)^20 = (1/4 + 1/2p+ q) ^ 10

LHS <=0 and RHS >= 0 so both are 0

So b =- 1/2a and 1/2p + q + 1/4 = 0

So a = - 2b and 2p + 2q + 1 = 0

by putting suitable values of x you can proceed.

put x = 0 to get 1= b^20 + q^ 10

so b= (sin t)^(1/10) , q = (cos t)^(1/5)

a = -2 (sin t)^(1/10), p = - ( 1+ (cos t)^(1/5))/2

should be the solution for some t

unless I have missed out something
 
anemone said:
Find all real $p$, $q$, $a$ and $b$ such that we have $$(2x-1)^{20}-(ax+b)^{20}=(x^2+px+q)^{10}$$ for all $x$.
Compare coefficients of $x^{20}$ to get $2^{20} - a^{20} = 1$. So $a = \pm (2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$. As kaliprasad points out, $b = -\frac12a$, so $b = \mp\frac12(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$. Therefore $ax+b = \pm(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}\bigl(x-\frac12\bigr)$, and $(ax+b)^{20} = (2^{20} - 1)\bigl(x-\frac12\bigr)^{20}$. Thus $$(2x-1)^{20}-(ax+b)^{20}= 2^{20}\bigl(x-\tfrac12\bigr)^{20} - (2^{20} - 1)\bigl(x-\tfrac12\bigr)^{20} = \bigl(x-\tfrac12\bigr)^{20} = \bigl(x^2- x + \tfrac14\bigr)^{10}.$$ So we must take $p=-1$ and $q=\frac14.$

So the solution is $a = \pm (2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$, $b = \mp\frac12(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$, $p=-1$, $q=\frac14.$
 
Thank you all for the replies...I greatly appreciate all the helps!:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top