MHB Unraveling the Mystery: Solving for Real Values in a Complex Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation (2x-1)^{20} - (ax+b)^{20} = (x^2+px+q)^{10} for real values of p, q, a, and b. Initial attempts to expand the equation led to complex coefficients, making it difficult to isolate the variables. A breakthrough was achieved by setting specific values for a and b, leading to relationships between them and the coefficients of the polynomial. Ultimately, the solution was found to be a = ±(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}, b = ∓(1/2)(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}, p = -1, and q = 1/4. The collaborative effort highlighted the importance of strategic substitutions in simplifying complex equations.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

Initially, I thought this is another boring high school mathematics problem, but when I started to work on it, I realized I was beaten by it, with equations in variables $a$, $b$, $p$ and $q$ to which I don't see a clear way to find the values for them.

Problem:

Find all real $p$, $q$, $a$ and $b$ such that we have $$(2x-1)^{20}-(ax+b)^{20}=(x^2+px+q)^{10}$$ for all $x$.

Attempt:

After expanding both sides of the equation using wolfram, I get

$$(1048576-a^{20})x^{20}-(10485760+20a^{19}b)x^{19}+(49807360-190a^{18}b^2)x^{18}+\cdots-(1140a^3b^{17}+9120)x^{3}$$
$$
+(-190a^2b^{18}+760)x^{2}-(20ab^{19}+40)x+1-b^{20}=x^{20}+10px^{19}+(10q^9+45p^2q^8)x^{2}+10pq^9x+q^{10}$$

And I ended up getting extremely messy equations where solving for the values for $a$, $b$, $p$ and $q$ seems impossible by equating the coefficient of $x^{20}$, $x^{19}$, $x^{18}$, $x^{3}$, $x^{2}$, $x$ and the constant...

Could anyone help me with this problem?

Thanks in advance.


 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Some solutions would be obtained by letting

$$a=2,b=-1$$

and finding the roots for

$$x^2+px+q=0$$
 
Because it is true for all x you can choose any value of x

setting x = 1/2 shall make 1st term = 0

we get

- (b+1/2a)^20 = (1/4 + 1/2p+ q) ^ 10

LHS <=0 and RHS >= 0 so both are 0

So b =- 1/2a and 1/2p + q + 1/4 = 0

So a = - 2b and 2p + 2q + 1 = 0

by putting suitable values of x you can proceed.
 
kaliprasad said:
Because it is true for all x you can choose any value of x

setting x = 1/2 shall make 1st term = 0

we get

- (b+1/2a)^20 = (1/4 + 1/2p+ q) ^ 10

LHS <=0 and RHS >= 0 so both are 0

So b =- 1/2a and 1/2p + q + 1/4 = 0

So a = - 2b and 2p + 2q + 1 = 0

by putting suitable values of x you can proceed.

put x = 0 to get 1= b^20 + q^ 10

so b= (sin t)^(1/10) , q = (cos t)^(1/5)

a = -2 (sin t)^(1/10), p = - ( 1+ (cos t)^(1/5))/2

should be the solution for some t

unless I have missed out something
 
anemone said:
Find all real $p$, $q$, $a$ and $b$ such that we have $$(2x-1)^{20}-(ax+b)^{20}=(x^2+px+q)^{10}$$ for all $x$.
Compare coefficients of $x^{20}$ to get $2^{20} - a^{20} = 1$. So $a = \pm (2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$. As kaliprasad points out, $b = -\frac12a$, so $b = \mp\frac12(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$. Therefore $ax+b = \pm(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}\bigl(x-\frac12\bigr)$, and $(ax+b)^{20} = (2^{20} - 1)\bigl(x-\frac12\bigr)^{20}$. Thus $$(2x-1)^{20}-(ax+b)^{20}= 2^{20}\bigl(x-\tfrac12\bigr)^{20} - (2^{20} - 1)\bigl(x-\tfrac12\bigr)^{20} = \bigl(x-\tfrac12\bigr)^{20} = \bigl(x^2- x + \tfrac14\bigr)^{10}.$$ So we must take $p=-1$ and $q=\frac14.$

So the solution is $a = \pm (2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$, $b = \mp\frac12(2^{20} - 1)^{1/20}$, $p=-1$, $q=\frac14.$
 
Thank you all for the replies...I greatly appreciate all the helps!:)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top