Where to begin...
ComputerGeek said:
as you should, but that does not protect you from spyware which affects the stability of the system. The fact of the matter is that for most people, Windows becomes infected and messy because most people do not know how to manage a computer. Education is the key, but you cannot educate most of the people because they are past that point in their life or have no interest to go and find someone to teach them.
If people are uneducated and can't stick to quality sites that is their problem not mine. Windows does not infect itself. People take that upon themselves. Do not blame Microsoft for the community's ignorance.
ComputerGeek said:
I simply was making a point that Windows it not the cause of the infection. You are blaming a static product that an end user manipulates.
ComputerGeek said:
It is out of date because IE has not been updated technology wise in 5 years, the underlying technology is 5 years old or more and there are no added features to the system for 5 years. The service packs have made it more secure, but they have done nothing for advancing the state of windows technology.
Personally I don't see any serious need to change it. I have been a happy IE user for years. It works well and is the most functional browser I can think of. If someone is worried about security, they can simply disable Active X and what not and take it down to every other browser's level.
ComputerGeek said:
no one has. but that is kind of a pointless aspect when most people that have a computer use it for something other than gaming. I have not bought or played a game in nearly 8 years. My priorities are adult priorities and I have to get work done.
Ok so you haven't played a game in nearly 8 years. Does that mean that nobody else has played a game in nearly 8 years? No. Your reasoning is absolutey awful. Your priorities simply do not match everyone elses. There are plenty of people out there that play games and enjoy the capabilities of DirectX.
ComputerGeek said:
sure I can. I have come across hardware that does not work under windows but then I plug it into my Linux system and it works right away without any configuration. Unless you are talking about GFX cards or sound cards, Windows hardware support is actually poorer than Linux. Will Windows run on SPARC? will it run on Dragonball? will it run on PPC? will it run on MIPS?
nope. and if your intention was to say that OS X hardware support is sketchy, it certainly is not. you need to buy GFX cards built to work on OpenFirmware, and sound cards are not available, but everything else is a plug in and play.
I think video and sound are pretty freaking important! You are comparing an enterprise OS to a home user OS. Sure you can say Windows Server won't run on SPARC or PPC or whatever too. It simply wasn't designed to. Does that make it a flaw? I don't think so. Just because a DVD won't work in a VHS deck doesn't make it inferior.
Sure linux may provide a lot of hardware support, but it can be a real headache to get some stuff working. Windows makes it easy. How can you knock that? Windows make programs easy to install. Nothing like having dependancy issues and such as you do in Linux.
I do realize Linux has come a long way with package management, but it still doesn't compare to Windows installations.
Linux has potential, but not for the normal person. I have helped many people navigate simple functions in Windows. Linux is far less friendly. It has gotten better there is no arguing, but Linux is more for the enthusiast crowd. I just don't see it catching up to Microsoft anytime soon. A lot of people might pitch a fit about Microsoft, but I have to be honest and commend their hard work. They have pushed out a package that will work with virtually all home PCs. That is an amazing feat considering the variety of hardware out there. On top of that, the installation is a breeze. You don't have to pick which kernel to boot. You don't have to put conditional arguments at the boot prompt to avoid locking up. I am not declaring Linux difficult to install for a computer savy person, but for most people it would be a scary experience.
Windows easily has the largest software library. Linux simply cannot run the apps I use (which a lot of people use). It can run some of them, but not nearly enough. Even some of the apps that do run are buggy.