MHB Upper and Lower bound of the recursive relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Relation
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the asymptotic upper and lower bounds for the recursive relation T(n) = 5T(n/5) + n/ln(n). The master theorem is initially considered for application, but doubts arise regarding its suitability due to the nature of f(n) being asymptotically smaller than n. A substitution method is proposed, transforming the relation using m = log_5(n) to simplify the analysis. The resulting equation leads to a summation involving S(m), which requires further exploration to derive the bounds. The conversation highlights the challenges in applying the master theorem and the potential of substitution for solving the recursive relation.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I have to define an asymptotic upper and lower bound of the recursive relation $T(n)=5 T(\frac{n}{5})+\frac{n}{ \lg n}$.

I thought that I could use the master theorem,since the recursive relation is of the form $T(n)=aT(\frac{n}{b})+f(n)$

$$a=5 \geq 1 , b=5>1 , f(n)=\frac{n}{ \lg n}$$

$$f'(n)=\frac{ \lg n-1}{ \lg^2 n}>0 \Rightarrow \lg n >1 \Rightarrow n>2$$

So, $f(n)$ is asymptotically positive and increasing $\forall n>2$.

$$n^{\log_b a}=n^{\log_5 5}=n$$

We see that $f(n) < n$

$$f(n)=O(n^{ \log_b a- \epsilon})=O(n^{1- \epsilon})$$

But how can we find the $\epsilon$ ? (Thinking) Or can't we apply in this case the master theorem? (Worried)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the master theorem cannot be applied. (Shake)

But..we could do it with substitution,right? (Thinking)

We set $m= \log_5{n} \Rightarrow n=5^m$

Then,we have:

$$T(5^m)=5T(5^{m-1})+\frac{5^m}{m} \\ \Rightarrow \frac{T(5^m)}{5^m}=\frac{T(5^{m-1})}{5^{m-1}}+\frac{1}{m}$$

Let $S(m)=\frac{T(5^m)}{5^m}$

So:

$$S(m)=S(m-1)+\frac{1}{m} \\ S(m-1)=S(m-2)+\frac{1}{m-1} \\ \dots \\ \dots \\ S(2)=S(1)+\frac{1}{2} \\ + --------------- \\ \Rightarrow S(m)=S(1)+\left ( \frac{1}{2}+ \dots + \frac{1}{m}\right )$$

But,how could we continue? (Thinking)
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K