Upper function and lebesgue integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter travis0868
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Integrals
Click For Summary
Constant functions can be considered upper functions as they satisfy the definition in Apostol's Mathematical Analysis. The discussion revolves around the implications of this classification on theorems 10.6(b) and 10.14(a). While constant functions fit the criteria for upper functions, the integral properties outlined in theorem 10.6(b) hold true only for non-negative constants. The confusion arises when applying theorem 10.14(a) to conclude that the integral of a negative upper function behaves similarly, which is not valid without proper handling of the negative sign. Ultimately, while constant functions are upper functions, their treatment in integrals requires careful consideration of the signs involved.
travis0868
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am comparing theorem 10.6(c) and 10.14(a) in Apostol's Mathematical Analysis.

My question is this:

Are constant functions considered upper functions? They certainly seem to fit the definition 10.4 for upper functions:

A real-valued function f defined on an interval I is called an upper function on I, and we write f \in U(I), if there exists an increasing sequence of step functions {s_n} such that:
<br /> a)\ s_n \nearrow\ f\ a.e.\ on\ I,<br />
and
<br /> b)\ \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \int_\textrm{I} s_n \is\ finite.<br />

There there's definition 10.12 for Lebesgue integrable functions:

We denote by L(I) the set of all functions f of the form f = u - v where u\in U(I) and v\in U(I). Each function f in L(I) is said to be Lebesgue-integrable on I and its integral is defined by the equation \int_\textrm{I} f = \int_\textrm{I} u - \int_\textrm{I} v

Here's thm 10.14(a):

Assume\ f \in L(I)\ and\ g \in L(I).\ Then\ we\ have\ (af + bg) \in L(I)\ for\ every\ real\ a\ and\ b\ \int_\textrm{I} (af + bg) = a \int_\textrm{I} f + b \int_\textrm{I} g.<br />

Assuming that a constant function is an upper function, let v = 0. Choose some arbitrary upper function u. Let f = u - 0 and thus f is a member of L(I). Then \int_\textrm{I} f = \int_\textrm{I} u. By thm 10.14, \int_\textrm{I} -f = - \int_\textrm{I} f. Thus \int_\textrm{I} -f = - \int_\textrm{I} u.

But it is not always true that

integral -u = - integral u

when u is an upper function according to Thm 10.6(b):

Assume\ f \in U(I)\ and\ g \in U(I).\ Then:\ cf \in U(I)\ for\ ever\ constant\ c \geq 0\ and \int_\textrm{I} cf = c \int_\textrm{I} f

Notice that c must be >= 0. There's even a problem in the text that shows that thm 10.6(b) isn't always true if that assumption is violated.

My point is that if constant functions are allowed as upper functions, then thm 10.14(a) implies thm 10.6(b) should be true for all real c, not just non-negative c. Any thoughts on where my logic is wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I see my mistake. A constant is an upper function, but:

if u \in U(I) and f = u. Then f \in L(I). But \int -f = - \int u. The negative must be on the outside of the integral sign for u.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K