Upper Level Math Courses: Is This Overkill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jawbreaker
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around whether taking multiple upper-level math courses alongside physics classes is manageable. Concerns focus on the difficulty of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) and Vector & Tensor Analysis, particularly their relevance to Electromagnetism (E&M). Participants suggest that while upper-level courses may seem more challenging, having the necessary prerequisites and intellectual maturity can make them manageable. However, there is a cautionary note that students who excelled in earlier courses may struggle with the increased workload and complexity of advanced material. Ultimately, balancing coursework with a part-time job and research is a significant consideration for success.
Jawbreaker
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I know all your PF veterans may get sick of answering this question, but you have the experience I don't have yet so I'll ask anyways. Is this schedule overkill, or doable?

1. E&M I
2. Modern Physics
3. PDE's with Fourier analysis
4. Vector & Tensor Analysis
5. Planetary Geophysics

My main concern is about 3 & 4. I heard PDE's and Fourier series was important for E&M, hence me taking it concurrently. Vector and Tensor analysis is useful somewhere I know. General Relativity for sure. Would two upper level math courses be overkill? I know this is all subjective, but I don't want to get into too much than I can handle. I'll be also holding a part time job and possible research position. Thank you all for your imput. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much of the material did you cover through self-study?
 
Should be fine, it's somewhat of an illusion that upper year courses are more difficult than lower year courses. If you have the prerequisites then it shouldn't be a problem.
 
CaptainQuaser said:
Should be fine, it's somewhat of an illusion that upper year courses are more difficult than lower year courses. If you have the prerequisites then it shouldn't be a problem.
It isn't an illusion, there is more stuff per course the higher you get but you are expected to have matured intellectually so that you can learn faster and you are supposed to be more organized by the second/third year as well.
Many who have straight A's through the first parts starts to falter when they hit the harder courses.
 
Looks standard to me.

Klockan3 said:
Many who have straight A's through the first parts starts to falter when they hit the harder courses.

That's a big fear of mine.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top