Other USAPhO test -- When should I be able to answer these questions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaac0427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by a student preparing for the USA Physics Olympiad (USAPhO) exam. The student expresses difficulty with the semi-final exam questions despite a solid understanding of basic physics concepts. Key points include the recognition that the material covered in the USAPhO exams is typically learned at the university level, and it is not expected for high school students to easily solve these problems. The focus of the exam is on problem-solving skills rather than pure knowledge of physics. To prepare, it is recommended to build a strong foundation in high school physics, progress to undergraduate textbooks, and engage in diverse practice problems. The conversation also touches on the importance of perseverance and the value of attempting to qualify for the US team, regardless of current proficiency. Additionally, there is a request for recommendations on textbooks suitable for this level of study.
Isaac0427
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
163
Hi,

I wasn't too sure what forum to put this question in, so I apologize if it is in the wrong one.

I have been looking at the past exams for the USA physics olympiad ( https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2016/exams.cfm ). I have been pretty good with the fnet=ma exams, but when it comes to the semi-final exam/USAPhO exam, I can barely answer a single question. I can figure some stuff out here and there, but for the most part I'm stuck the entire time. I am taking AP Physics C next year (although I do know some calculus-based physics), which will help with some of that, but from what I know about the curriculum in C, it doesn't begin to cover some of the quantum and relativity in there. So, my questions are:

1. At what stage in physics education is most of the material on those exams learned?

2. As someone who wants to be a theoretical physicist, by the time I graduate from high school, should I be able to answer those questions easily? And, on a related note, would any theoretical physicist be able to look at those problems and immediately know how to solve them?

3. How should I go about learning the materials on those exams?

I'd love to try and get on the US team (which I will try to do anyways, because it doesn't hurt to try), so any other tips would be appreciated.

Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isaac0427 said:
Hi,

I wasn't too sure what forum to put this question in, so I apologize if it is in the wrong one.

I have been looking at the past exams for the USA physics olympiad ( https://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2016/exams.cfm ). I have been pretty good with the fnet=ma exams, but when it comes to the semi-final exam/USAPhO exam, I can barely answer a single question. I can figure some stuff out here and there, but for the most part I'm stuck the entire time. I am taking AP Physics C next year (although I do know some calculus-based physics), which will help with some of that, but from what I know about the curriculum in C, it doesn't begin to cover some of the quantum and relativity in there. So, my questions are:

1. At what stage in physics education is most of the material on those exams learned?

2. As someone who wants to be a theoretical physicist, by the time I graduate from high school, should I be able to answer those questions easily? And, on a related note, would any theoretical physicist be able to look at those problems and immediately know how to solve them?

3. How should I go about learning the materials on those exams?

I'd love to try and get on the US team (which I will try to do anyways, because it doesn't hurt to try), so any other tips would be appreciated.

Thank you very much in advance.

In Australia at least, the exam is designed to be extremely difficult, and it's not expected that anyone does extremely well - the people who get on the team are just the ones who do the least poorly. The point is to test your problem solving skills, not necessarily your knowledge of physics. So:

1. University.
2. (a) No. (b) No. But they could probably figure it out.
3. I'd be getting a good foundation in high school physics, then moving onto undergrad textbooks later. Do many and diverse practise problems.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and Isaac0427
e.bar.goum said:
In Australia at least, the exam is designed to be extremely difficult, and it's not expected that anyone does extremely well - the people who get on the team are just the ones who do the least poorly. The point is to test your problem solving skills, not necessarily your knowledge of physics. So:

1. University.
2. (a) No. (b) No. But they could probably figure it out.
3. I'd be getting a good foundation in high school physics, then moving onto undergrad textbooks later. Do many and diverse practise problems.
Thank you very much. Do you know of any good textbooks for something like this?
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top