1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Use discriminant for linear and quad. function.

  1. May 21, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    upload_2016-5-21_13-43-34.png


    2. Relevant equations
    upload_2016-5-21_13-45-27.png

    upload_2016-5-21_13-51-9.png
    3. The attempt at a solution
    upload_2016-5-21_13-51-57.png
    upload_2016-5-21_13-52-20.png

    Back again :) Is this correct?

    Thanks.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. May 21, 2016 #2
    Again you are correct. :smile:
     
  4. May 21, 2016 #3

    fresh_42

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes. Only that I have ##(-1.09 ; 1.73)## and ##(2.76 ; 13.27)##. But the path is correct.
    It's always better to have exact numbers until the end and calculate the roots in a final step.
     
  5. May 21, 2016 #4

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    In thread after thread you ask "is this correct?...". That is a bad habit: as a matter of standard operating procedure you should check your answers for yourself (as you would need to do in an exam setting). Then, if you find something does not "work", you will know you have made an error somewhere, and asking for help then makes sense.
     
  6. May 22, 2016 #5
    I agree , I have already given the OP a way to check her work in a related similar thread.
     
  7. May 22, 2016 #6
    I understand, but can you suggest a less time consuming method than graphing, if I am doing an exam I won't have time to graph anything to check my answer. For this specific question, is there a way I can put the points back into the equation to verify, well maybe in this case I would have to graph since they are points of intersection.

    Also I should be more clear when asking my question ( I will make sure to do that in future questions), in this case I would like to know if my process for part b is correct, does it make sense to use the linear equation to solve for y-values, and if so, is it because the linear equation is set equal to y?
     
  8. May 22, 2016 #7

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    To save time, don't graph anything; just check if your (x,y) values satisfy the requirement that they lie on both the line and the curve. That is easy: just plug in the numbers and calculate.

    I have not checked your calculations for part (b), but I see that you have used the correct formulas. Again, you can check the solutions for yourself, by plugging in the numerical values and doing the calculations to see if everything works as it should.

    Again: this is all just standard practice that you should get in the habit of doing.
     
  9. May 22, 2016 #8

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    Sure. You can substitute the points you found into each equation. If the point is on the graph, the equation should be a true statement.
    In your work above, you found one solution to be ##x = \frac{5 + \sqrt{133}}{6}##. The corresponding y value is ##y = \frac{15 + \sqrt{133}}{2}## If you substitute this x value into the right sides of the equations ##y = 3x^2 - 2x - 4## and ##y = 3x + 5## you should get the y value I show above. Note that the values I show are the exact values. If you approximate the x values using a calculator, the y values you get will be only as precise as the rounding you do.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Use discriminant for linear and quad. function.
  1. Discriminant Question (Replies: 26)

  2. Linear Functions (Replies: 3)

Loading...