Use household items to approximate human lung capacity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for approximating human lung capacity using household items. Participants explore various experimental setups and techniques, focusing on practical applications and measurements related to lung capacity, tidal volume, and vital capacity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a plastic bag and containers to measure lung capacity by inflating the bag with exhaled air.
  • Another proposes using a rigid transparent container filled with water to measure the volume of air expelled by blowing into it through a hose.
  • A different participant describes using a demijohn filled with water, emphasizing the ability to measure the volume accurately by marking the water level.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of measurements due to the weight of water affecting pressure, with some suggesting corrections based on high school physics principles.
  • One participant suggests using a trash can liner and a bucket of known volume to estimate lung capacity, while noting potential risks of hyperventilation.
  • Another participant shares their experience with filling a 16-liter bucket using lungfuls of air to demonstrate the method's feasibility.
  • There is a discussion about the difference between measuring lung capacity and tidal volume, with references to definitions from Wikipedia.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the methods and accuracy of measuring lung capacity, with some agreeing on the techniques while others challenge the definitions and measurements being discussed. The distinction between lung capacity and tidal volume remains a point of contention.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the measurements may not accurately reflect total lung capacity but rather tidal volume or vital capacity, indicating potential limitations in the experimental setups discussed.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
I would like suggestions for using household items to approximate human lung capacity. Thinking my lung capacity was at issue (quick research showed it to be about 4.8 liters) I thought how I might measure it using household items and I came up with the following.

The opening of a thin plastic bag was wrapped tightly around a short piece of plastic hose and then a rubber band wrapped tightly around that with care to not inflate the plastic bag. The top of a plastic 1 gallon water container was removed and the un-inflated plastic bag was inserted into the container. Inhaling as much air as I could I then inflated the plastic bag in the container and was surprised that I was able to easily inflate the plastic bag completely inside its 1 gallon enclosure. I needed more capacity so I repeated the experiment with both a gallon container and a quart container and was able to just inflate both bags, one in the gallon container and one in a quart container, roughly measuring average lung capacity.

Suggestions on how to improve this measurement using common and inexpensive materials appreciated.

https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/how-lungs-work/lung-capacity-and-aging
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find a rigid transparent container with a neck. Fill it with water and hold it inverted with the neck submerged. Blow your air into that with a short hose. The water level in the inverted container now indicates the volume expelled.

It can be done with a cup, say half liter. Just fill the thing multiple times until you run out of air. A cup might work better than a drink bottle due to the speed at which it can be refilled with water on each iteration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and Spinnor
I used to use a demijohn filled with water and inverted in a bowl of water. Then simply blow air in through a plastic tube. Two easy ways to measure the volume. Rough measurement can be marked on side as you fill with water. More accurately, measure the full volume, then measure the water left after expt.

As you say, 4.5 l is not enough for a fit adult male. I used two jars and switched the tube when one was nearly filled with air.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and Spinnor
I like that method, very precise. The weight of the water will slightly lower the pressure of the water over estimating volume but high school physics gives the correction?
 
An improvement of my technique? Get 10 gallon trash can plastic bag liner and seal a short length of hose as in post 1. Then using a bucket of know volume see how many lungfuls of air it takes to inflate the plastic bag in the bucket, the last lungful will need to be estimated.
 
I had to Google demijohn, I have one:smile:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Spinnor said:
I like that method, very precise. The weight of the water will slightly lower the pressure of the water over estimating volume but high school physics gives the correction?
Pressure on the water in the container can be eliminated by having it level with the water surface when you note the air level at the end of the exhale. The air then will be at normal pressure and will fill the volume as marked on the container.

As for the trash bag, do you really know where it needs to be tied off to hold exactly 10 gallons? Also, you're likely to pass out if you take say 8 full lungfulls to get that bag inflated. I once had to inflate an air mattress by blowing, and I had to run laps while holding my breath between blows in attempt to not over-oxygenate myself.
 
Halc said:
As for the trash bag, do you really know where it needs to be tied off to hold exactly 10 gallons?

That is where the container of known volume comes in. You inflate the bag in the container and when the inflated bag fills the container you will approximate the volume, a "lid" helps.

Just did 4 lungfuls each over two experiments to displace 5 gallons (minus about a cup of water) and did not get faint.

1589910804082.png


1589911105384.png
 
16 liter bucket with 10 gallon trash bag and lid, dog for a sense of scale.

1589911547548.png


16 liter bucket with 10 gallon trash bag.

1589911622345.png


With some care, 2 3/4 lungfuls then 2 7/8 lungfuls to fill bag in 16 liter bucket.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Spinnor said:
The weight of the water will slightly lower the pressure of the water over estimating volume but high school physics gives the correction?

Okay, or you could just lower (or raise) the bottle until the water levels line up, then cap it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spinnor
  • #12
Spinnor said:
I would like suggestions for using household items to approximate human lung capacity.
You are not measuring lung capacity. You are measuring the tidal volume.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #13
Baluncore said:
You are not measuring lung capacity. You are measuring the tidal volume.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_volume

"Tidal volume (symbol VT or TV) is the lung volume representing the normal volume of air displaced between[clarification needed] normal inhalation and exhalation when extra effort is not applied. "

1590149638028.png


From the wiki article image it looks like I was measuring "vital capacity".
 

Attachments

  • 1590149492679.png
    1590149492679.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 293
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K