MHB Use Ito's Lemma to solve the stochastic differential equatio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason4
  • Start date Start date
Jason4
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I've been at this for ages but I can't make sense of it. Can somebody help me out?Use Ito's Lemma to solve the stochastic differential equation:

X_t=2+\int_{0}^{t}(15-9X_s)ds+7\int_{0}^{t}dB_s

and find:

E(X_t)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jason said:
I've been at this for ages but I can't make sense of it. Can somebody help me out?Use Ito's Lemma to solve the stochastic differential equation:

X_t=2+\int_{0}^{t}(15-9X_s)ds+7\int_{0}^{t}dB_s

and find:

E(X_t)

In 'standard form' the SDE is written as...

$\displaystyle d X_{t}= (15-9\ X_{t})\ dt + 7\ dW_{t}\ ,\ x_{0}=2$ (1)

The (1) is a linear in narrow sense SDE andits solving procedure has been described in...

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f23/unsolved-statistic-questions-other-sites-part-ii-1566/index2.html#post8411

... and its solution is...

$\displaystyle X_{t}= \varphi_{t}\ \{ x_{0} +\int_{0}^{t} \varphi_{s}^{-1}\ u_{s}\ ds + \int_{0}^{t} \varphi_{s}^{-1}\ v_{s}\ dW_{s} \}$ (2)


Here is $a_{t}=-9$ , so that is $\varphi_{t}=e^{-9 t}$,$u_{t}=15$, $v_{t}=7$ and $x_{0}=2$ so that (2) becomes...

$\displaystyle X_{t}= e^{- 9 t}\ \{ 2 + 15\ \int_{0}^{t} e^{9 s} ds + 7\ \int_{0}^{t} e^{9 s}\ dW_{s} \}= e^{-9 t}\ \{2 + \frac{5}{3}\ (e^{9 t}-1) + \frac{7}{9}\ (e^{9 W_{t}}-1) - \frac{7}{2}\ (e^{9t}-1) \} = $

$\displaystyle = - \frac{11}{6} + \frac {55}{18}\ e^{-9 t} + \frac{7}{9}\ e^{9\ (W_{t}-t)}$ (3)

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top