Use of tensor densities / pseudo tensors in physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept and application of tensor densities, particularly those with non-integer weights, in physics. Participants explore the necessity and relevance of these mathematical constructs, questioning their usage and understanding in various contexts, including quantum mechanics and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the necessity of tensor densities, questioning their relevance and suggesting that those with integer weights can be expressed as standard tensors.
  • Another participant mentions two commonly used tensor densities: the determinant of the metric and the Levi-Civita symbol, but clarifies that they are not the focus of the inquiry regarding non-integer weights.
  • There is a repeated inquiry about the existence and application of tensor densities with non-integer weights, with one participant stating they have never encountered such entities in physics.
  • Wavefunctions in quantum mechanics are proposed as examples of "densities of weight 1/2," but participants express confusion about why tensor terminology applies to wavefunctions.
  • A participant references a Wikipedia article discussing the transformations of tensor densities, noting a lack of examples and questioning the contemporary relevance of the concept.
  • Another participant suggests consulting Geroch's "Geometrical Quantum Mechanics" for a clearer definition of densities of weight W, which they find more comprehensible than previous readings.
  • Concerns are raised about the definition of tensor densities being ill-defined for negative weights, highlighting potential limitations in the mathematical framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relevance or application of tensor densities with non-integer weights. Multiple viewpoints are presented, with some participants expressing uncertainty and others proposing specific examples or references.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding and the definitions encountered in literature, particularly regarding the applicability of tensor densities in modern physics and the challenges posed by non-integer weights.

burakumin
Messages
84
Reaction score
7
Hello

I've sometime read physics texts that mention tensor densities (or pseudo-tensors). I find they are quite an ugly notion and I'm not sure to understand their necessity in physics. I have realized that tensor densities with an integer weight can be expressed differently with standard tensors and that the use of pseudotensors in this context is only a sort of "simplification of notation". But i'd really like to know if tensor densities with non-integer weights are really used in physics and in which context.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two most used tensor densities: [tex]\det g_{\mu\nu}[/tex] and Levi-Civita symbol.
 
Thank you netheril96 but I'm asking about tensor densities with non integer weights. To me things like [itex]\det(g)[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{i_1i_2\ldots{}i_n}[/itex] can be thought as real tensors. I'm looking for entities really used in physics that could not be seen this way.

Should this question be asked in the relativity forum as tensor calculus is frequent in this field ?
 
burakumin said:
Thank you netheril96 but I'm asking about tensor densities with non integer weights. To me things like [itex]\det(g)[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{i_1i_2\ldots{}i_n}[/itex] can be thought as real tensors. I'm looking for entities really used in physics that could not be seen this way.

Should this question be asked in the relativity forum as tensor calculus is frequent in this field ?

My bad. I personally have never encountered any tensor density of non-integer weight.
 
Wavefunctions in quantum mechanics are "densities of weight 1/2". (Google the quoted phrase.)
 
robphy said:
Wavefunctions in quantum mechanics are "densities of weight 1/2". (Google the quoted phrase.)

Googled, and nothing interesting showed up.

And why are wavefunctions tensor densities?
 
robphy said:
Wavefunctions in quantum mechanics are "densities of weight 1/2". (Google the quoted phrase.)

I'm not sure to understand why tensor terminology would be relevant in the case of Wavefunctions.

netheril96 said:
I personally have never encountered any tensor density of non-integer weight.

Ok. The article in wikipedia says "The transformations for even and odd tensor densities have the benefit of being well defined even when W is not an integer" but does not show any example of such objects. So I was wondering about their usefullness. The books I've skimed that mentioned tensor densities were a bit old so I guess this is not concept widely used anymore.
 
consult
Geroch's "Geometrical Quantum Mechanics",
III Quantum Mechanics
14. Densities. Integrals.
15. States
 
robphy said:
consult
Geroch's "Geometrical Quantum Mechanics",
III Quantum Mechanics
14. Densities. Integrals.
15. States

Ok. The definition given for densities of weight W (W-homogenous applications from the maximum exterior power to a tensor space) is interesting and much cleaner than anything I've read before. Still I'm wondering if it is possible for a given (complex ?) vector space to define its "tensorial square root" so that densities of weights 1/2 could be defined as tensors on that space...
 
  • #10
burakumin said:
W-homogenous applications from the maximum exterior power to a tensor space ...

I've suddenly realized something : using the definition of the article, tensor densities are ill-defined for numbers [itex]\alpha < 0[/itex] as [itex]\alpha^s[/itex] has no meaning for [itex]s \not \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex]. And considering complex numbers does not solve the problem given that there is no unique possible solution ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
17K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
6K