Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Using a semicolon in a functin argument. eg. f = f(x, y; t)

  1. Mar 26, 2013 #1
    Hi
    I've seen this a few times, where we say f = f(x, y; t) for example, without a proper definition or any guidelines of usage. In my mind I read this as "f is a function over x and y, but it is also dependent on t although this is usually a fixed parameter", even though we might have some function like

    f(x,y;t) = yx2/t

    i.e. from looking at the form of f, you could not tell which variables would go either side of the semicolon.

    Perhaps it can also be read as f being a family of functions over (x,y), where each is parametrised by t. But then this is just semantics, the maths is no different, so what's the point in the semicolon?

    Does anyone know a better definition of this notation?

    Thanks
    Mike
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 26, 2013 #2

    jedishrfu

    Staff: Mentor

    I think its your second definition of a set of surfaces in 3-space with varying 't' value.
     
  4. Mar 26, 2013 #3

    jbunniii

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    There is no mathematical need for the semicolon. The notations ##f(x,y;t)## and ##f(x,y,t)## mean the same thing. The semicolon is there because the author wants to group the function parameters in some way, hopefully for the convenience of the reader: perhaps ##x## and ##y## are spatial coordinates and ##t## is time.
     
  5. Mar 27, 2013 #4
    Ah, perfect. That is exactly what I want to do.

    Thanks!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Using a semicolon in a functin argument. eg. f = f(x, y; t)
  1. Y^2=f(x), y=f(x) (Replies: 9)

  2. Condition of f(x,t) (Replies: 1)

  3. Y vs f(x) (Replies: 15)

Loading...