Using Correlation :Random Variables as a Normed Space (Banach, Hilbert maybe.?)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between correlation functions and inner products in the context of random variables. Participants explore the potential to define a normed space using correlation as an inner product, examining the implications for orthogonality and the structure of Hilbert spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that correlation functions could define a notion of orthogonality in a space of random variables, suggesting that correlation-0 random variables might be considered orthogonal.
  • Another participant states that the set of all random variables with a finite second moment forms a Hilbert space, linking this to the broader context of square integrable functions.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the analogy between correlation and the cosine of the angle between vectors, questioning whether an inner product could be defined to reflect this relationship, despite the non-linearity of correlation.
  • One participant mentions that in finite-dimensional Euclidean space, covariance can be related to the cosine of the angle between vectors, suggesting a geometric interpretation of correlation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying perspectives on the relationship between correlation and inner products, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of defining a normed space based on correlation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about linearity and the specific conditions under which correlation might serve as an inner product. The discussion also highlights the dependency on the definitions of the spaces involved.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, everyone:

I have been curious for a while about the similarity between the correlation
function and an inner-product: Both take a pair of objects and spit out
a number between -1 and 1, so it seems we could define a notion of orthogonality
in a space of random variables, so that correlation-0 random variables are orthogonal.

Does anyone know how far we can take this analogy, i.e., can we use correlation
as an inner-product to define a norm ( autocorrelation Corr(X,X)), and therefore
a normed space.?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The set, of all random variables over a given probability space, which have a finite second moment, is a Hilbert space.

This is a special case of the following: Given a measure space, the set of all square integrable functions is a Hilbert space.
 
Thanks.
What I was thinking about was more along the lines that
correlation as defined seems to mimic the cosine of the
angle between two vectors, given that -1<= Corr(X,Y)<=1
I wonder if there is some inner-product thatt would give rise to
this, as is the case with, e.g, R^n (n>1). I know we have some restrictions
since the above expression is not linear in neither x nor Y;
still, I wonder if there is a way of making it work.
 
In finite dimensional Euclidean space (a,b)=|a||b|cos(x), where | | denotes length and x is the angle between the vectors. The covariance is equivalent to cos(x).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
726
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K