Using Equipartition theory to solve the root mean square of a angle.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on applying the equipartition theorem to analyze the root mean square of an angle in a system involving helium gas and a mirror. It establishes that helium, being monatomic, has three degrees of freedom, leading to an internal energy of 3/2KT. The conversation emphasizes that the degrees of freedom of the mirror system are crucial, rather than those of the helium atoms. The average potential energy of the mirror can be derived using the equipartition theorem, specifically relating to the torsion constant and torsion angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the equipartition theorem in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of degrees of freedom in thermodynamics
  • Basic principles of mechanical energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equipartition theorem in detail, focusing on its applications in various systems
  • Learn about the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the implications of degrees of freedom on thermodynamic properties
  • Investigate the behavior of monatomic gases like helium under different conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and mechanical systems involving gases and oscillations.

Jameskd
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Any tips on how to solve this?
Relevant Equations
1/2mv^2 + 1/2kx^2
3/2nRT = E
1604952296236.png
For the first question, i believe that mechanical energy is conserved hence we can derive the total energy i think. In regards to the second question, I'm assuming its at room temperature, so helium is monotonic therefore it has 3 degrees of freedom, therefore its internal energy is 3/2KT. I am unsure how this relates to the question.

Finally for part c, this is a shot in the dark, but the average kinetic energy of helium is 3/2NKT , so if equate 3/2NKT = 1/2(torsion constant)(torsion angle)^2 and solve for it i end up getting something that doesn't make sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Jameskd said:
In regards to the second question, I'm assuming its at room temperature, so helium is monotonic therefore it has 3 degrees of freedom, therefore its internal energy is 3/2KT. I am unsure how this relates to the question.
Is it a matter of treating the mirror as just another particle in the mix?
 
Hello, jameskd.

For part (a) I think they want you to answer the following:
What property of a mass on a spring corresponds to ##I## in the energy equation for the mirror?
Similarly for ##\omega## , ##\mu##, and ##\theta##?

For part (b) the fact that the gas in this problem happens to be helium is not relevant. What's important is the number of degrees of freedom of the mirror system, not the number of degrees of freedom of a helium atom. You'll need a clear statement of the equipartition of energy theorem for this part.

Jameskd said:
Finally for part c, this is a shot in the dark, but the average kinetic energy of helium is 3/2NKT , so if equate 3/2NKT = 1/2(torsion constant)(torsion angle)^2 and solve for it i end up getting something that doesn't make sense.
Here it looks like you are equating the total kinetic energy of all of the helium atoms to the potential energy of the mirror system. That would mean that if you doubled the number (N) of helium atoms, the potential energy of the mirror would double. But there is no way for the mirror to "know" how many gas molecules are in its environment. The mirror is going to behave the same whether it's in a small flask of helium at temperature T, or in an large room filled with air at temperature T.

The average potential energy ##\frac 1 2 \mu \langle \theta^2 \rangle## of the mirror can be obtained from the equipartition of energy theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
928
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
37K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
14K