Using Legendre Polynomials in Electro

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a conducting spherical shell that is cut in half, with one hemisphere held at a potential and the other grounded. The task is to find the potential in the region outside the shell, specifically for terms up to r^-4, using concepts from electrostatics and Legendre polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Poisson's equation in spherical coordinates and the use of multipole expansion. There are questions about how to express the potential in terms of Legendre polynomials and how to combine this with the solution to Poisson's equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between multipole expansion and Legendre polynomials, while others express confusion about the hint provided in the problem statement. One participant claims to have found a solution using a different approach, focusing on the solution to Poisson's equation without multipole expansion.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of boundary conditions and the uniqueness theorem in the context of the solution, as well as the absence of charge density in the problem setup.

retro10x
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A conducting spherical shell of radius R is cut in half and the two halves are
infinitesimally separated (you can ignore the separation in the calculation). If the upper
hemisphere is held at potential V0 and the lower half is grounded find the approximate
potential for the region r > R (keeping terms up to and including those ~ r-4 ).

[Hint: you will need to expand the expression for the potential at the surface in terms of
Legendre polynomials and make use of the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials to
determine the necessary coefficients].


Homework Equations



Multipole expansion of V; Poisson's equation with ρ(charge density)=0 when r>R

The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm having trouble starting this. My initial gut feeling would be to solve the poisson equation outside the sphere, with \nabla^{2}V(r,θ)=0 , in spherical coordinates and then apply boundary conditions.
with θ as the angle from the z-axis towards the x-y plane

However the Hint made me think that the whole system is a kind of dipole, so that I would have to use the multipole expansion. I do not understand how to expand the expression in terms of Legendre Polynomials.

I know that the solution to poisson's equation in spherical coordinates involves a legendre polynomial Pλ(cosθ) and I know the series for a legendre polynomial. The problem is that I don't know how to combine both the multipole expansion and the poisson equation solution.

Can anyone help me understand this "Hint" better, and what it means to express the multipole expansion in terms of Legendre polynomials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The multipole expansion for azimuthally symmetric problems is in fact an expansion in terms of Legendre Polynomials!
 
The multipole expansion for azimuthally symmetric problems is in fact an expansion in terms of Legendre Polynomials!

Unless there is another formula for the multipole expansion, but doesn't that formula only work if there is a charge density? There isn't any charge in this problem, only a fixed potential difference.
 
I think I found the correct answer. I didn't use multipole expansion at all, I just used the solution to Poisson's equation in spherical coordinates. I had to use a Fourier transform to find the coefficients in terms of R, Vo and Legendre polynomials. I'm only asked for terms up to r^-4 so I only needed coefficients in the Fourier series from n=0 to n=3, so there were only 4 coefficients I had to solve for, for each one I used the corresponding Legendre term in the expression.

My solution satisfies the Boundary conditions, so thanks to the beautiful uniqueness theorem, I have my solution. :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K