Using Straight-Line Homotopies to Construct Free Homotopies

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter littleHilbert
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A path-connected space X is simply-connected if and only if any two loops in X are free homotopic. The discussion centers on the use of straight-line homotopies to construct free homotopies, specifically through the example of defining a homotopy H_f(t,s) involving loops u and v and a connecting curve w. The inquiry raises concerns about the validity of using straight-line homotopies in all cases, particularly in relation to the potential for the homotopy to exit the space X, such as when X is the 2-sphere S^2. The conclusion emphasizes the need for caution when applying straight-line homotopies in certain topological contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of path-connected spaces and simply-connected spaces in topology.
  • Familiarity with the concept of free homotopy and its implications.
  • Knowledge of homotopy theory and the construction of homotopies.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simply-connected spaces in algebraic topology.
  • Explore the concept of nullhomotopies and their applications in homotopy theory.
  • Research the implications of homotopies in different topological spaces, particularly S^2.
  • Learn about alternative methods for constructing homotopies beyond straight-line approaches.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, topologists, and students studying algebraic topology who are interested in the nuances of homotopy theory and its applications in various spaces.

littleHilbert
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Here is a short lemma:

A path-connected space X is simply-connected iff any two loops in X are free homotopic.

My question is whether it is allowed to use a straight-line homotopy straight away in order to construct a free homotopy? For example, let u and v be two loops and w is a curve from point a to point b. Then:<br /> \begin{equation} H_f(t,s):=<br /> \begin{cases} (1-3s)u(t)+3sa,\ \text{for $0\leqslant{}s\leqslant\frac{1}{3}$}; \\<br /> w(3s-1),\ \text{for $\frac{1}{3}\leqslant{}s\leqslant\frac{2}{3}$}; \\<br /> (3-3s)b+(3s-2)v(t),\ \text{for $\frac{2}{3}\leqslant{}s\leqslant1$}. <br /> \end{cases}<br /> \end{equation}<br />
(there is an error in the latex-output: "0" instead of "sh")
That would actually do, wouldn't it? I mean a Nullhomotopy is not necesserally a straight-line homotopy. So maybe it's a loss of generality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if your space is X=S^2? Wouldn't your homotopy travel outside X?
 
You're not guaranteed that "x+y" makes sense for x and y in X.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K