Studying Using Supplementary Textbooks for Coursework

Click For Summary
Using supplementary math and science textbooks alongside standard issued texts can significantly enhance understanding of the material. The discussion emphasizes the importance of utilizing both resources effectively. It is suggested to primarily follow the assigned textbook, addressing specific sections as required, and to consult supplementary texts when concepts are unclear. This approach helps prevent redundancy and optimizes study time. Concerns about missing critical information from either book are common, but the consensus is to focus on the assigned text first and use supplementary materials for clarification as needed. Ultimately, finding a personal study method that balances thoroughness and efficiency is key.
DS2C
I hope this is in the correct section. It applies to math, but not specifically a concept or anything.

Using really good math books compared to many of the standard issue texts provided from many schools has so far really improved my understanding of the material.

However, I've never used them WITH the issued text yet as I got all these books over the summer when I had no math classes. Now that the semester has started, I've been issued the standard text from the university but I greatly prefer the ones I have acquired.

My question is, when using supplementary textbooks, how do you go about utilizing both of them at the same time? Do you go all the way through one, then through another separately? Do you go tic for tac (such as going over one concept in one, then the same concept in the other text)?
This isn't necessarily specifically for math, but really just math and science in general. What's the best way to get the most bang for the buck in utilizing two texts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a teacher, I would expect students to read through the assigned text, as I consider the material it contains (I always specify which sections) to be an integral part of the course. My expectation is that a student will refer to a supplementary source when the material in the main textbook is not clear enough for them. So to answer your question, that would mean going first to the assigned textbook and then read topic by topic in the other books as the course progresses.
 
Didnt see this reply. Thank you.
I think I get a little too OCD with things like this. In having two books, I get paranoid that one book might have something important that the other doesn't and I don't want to miss out on the information.
 
I'm not sure that reading one chapter in one book and then switching to the other book to re-read the same material is a great use of time. Instead, I'd use the assigned textbook and if you are struggling to understand something, switch to the supplementary book. The number of times that I've banged my head against a textbook trying to understand something that was spelled out in a single sentence in another book is quite high.
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell and DrClaude
Good point, thank you. I want to get the most out of my study time but also don't want to miss important info. But don't we all...
I guess I will just have to see what works best. A time machine would work too.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K