Using the time evolution operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the time evolution operator in a 2D Hilbert space, specifically using the Pauli matrix in the y-direction as the Hamiltonian. The eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian are defined as |±>_{y} = (1/√2)(|e_{1}> ± i|e_{2}>). The time evolution operator U is applied to these eigenvectors, resulting in U|±>_{y} = exp(-i(t-t_{0})σ_{y}/ħ)|±>_{y}, which simplifies to U|±>_{y} = exp(∓i(t-t_{0})/ħ)|±>_{y} due to the eigenvalues of σ_y being ±1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D Hilbert spaces
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices, specifically σ_y
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics concepts such as eigenvectors and eigenvalues
  • Basic grasp of the time evolution operator in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the time evolution operator and its applications in quantum systems
  • Explore the concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the implications of time evolution in quantum mechanics using different Hamiltonians
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the dynamics of quantum systems using the time evolution operator.

ian2012
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I hope someone can help me out here,

I am confused with a line of text I read - it is an example of a 2D Hilbert space with orthonormal basis e1, e2. The Hamiltonian of the system is the Pauli matrix in the y-direction. Given by the matrix:

\sigma_{y} = (\frac{0, -i}{i, 0})

The eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian are given by:

| \pm >_{y}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| e_{1} > \pm i|e_{2}>)

So, applying the time evolution operator to the eigenvectors gives:

U| \pm >_{y}=exp(\frac{-i(t-t_{0}) \sigma_{y}}{\hbar})| \pm >_{y}
U| \pm >_{y}=exp(\frac{\mp i(t-t_{0})}{\hbar})| \pm >_{y}

I don't understand how the last line came about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The last line follows because the eigenvalues of \sigma_y are +/- 1.
 
Oh right, of course, so it let's you simplify the expression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K