Utilizing Cayley-Hamilton's Theorem to Solve N x N Determinant Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter kockabogyo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
kockabogyo
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
1. Given [itex]A,B\in Mat _n(\mathbb{R})[/itex]

2. Show that:
a) [itex]\det (A^2 + A + E)\geq 0[/itex]
b) [itex]\det (E+A+B+A^2+B^2)\geq 0[/itex] ,
where [itex]E[/itex] is the unit matrix.
3. My attempt at a solution
[itex]A^2 + A + E[/itex]=[itex](A + E)^2 -2A[/itex]


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8zKPTh1siSsOHNWQnBfaXR3QXM/view?usp=sharing
Snapshot.jpg

pleas give me tips to solve
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
Physics news on Phys.org
kockabogyo said:
[itex]A^2 + A + E[/itex]=[itex](A + E)^2 -2A[/itex]
Something went wrong with the linear term, and I would choose a different term to square.

You can consider the cases ##det(A)=0## and ##det(A) \neq 0## separately, that gives more freedom to manipulate A in one case.
 
mfb said:
Something went wrong with the linear term, and I would choose a different term to square.

You can consider the cases ##det(A)=0## and ##det(A) \neq 0## separately, that gives more freedom to manipulate A in one case.

Thanks, yes, sorry not - 2A only -A , but than?
 
mfb said:
I would choose a different term to square. A term that doesn't leave an A outside.

O Yeah!.. I think I found it.. Cayley Hamilton's context A2 - Tr(A)*A+det(A)*E = O