MHB Validating Statement Using Truth Tables: Failed Basket-Weaving 101

  • Thread starter Thread starter trevor
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on validating a logical statement using truth tables related to studying and failing a course. The argument presented is that if studying prevents failure, and not playing cards leads to studying, then failing indicates excessive card playing. Participants suggest constructing a truth table to analyze the implications of the statements involved. Recommendations include breaking down the statements into simpler propositions and using mnemonic names for clarity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of logical reasoning in validating the argument.
trevor
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If I study, then I will not fail basket-weaving 101. If I do not play cards to often, then
I will study. I failed basket-weaving 101. Therefore, I played cards too often. Is this
statement valid (use truth tables to verify).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trevor said:
If I study, then I will not fail basket-weaving 101. If I do not play cards to often, then
I will study. I failed basket-weaving 101. Therefore, I played cards too often. Is this
statement valid (use truth tables to verify).

Have you constructed a truth table? Care to share? :). If not, I recommend breaking down all the words into a string of implications. For example, let A be the statement "I study", B be the statement "I failed basket-weaving" etc and use these to help with the truth table.
 
Joppy said:
Have you constructed a truth table? Care to share? :). If not, I recommend breaking down all the words into a string of implications. For example, let A be the statement "I study", B be the statement "I failed basket-weaving" etc and use these to help with the truth table.

Thank you. I will send what I find
 
I would also recommend using mnemonic names for propositions, such as $S$ for "I studied" and $F$ for "I failed basket-weaving".
 

Thread 'Two interesting number theory tricks'

First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

High School Help on this truth table- Is this statement valid
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Truth Tables for Validity: Using Equations to Determine Satisfaction
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Prove that the statement is always true using the rules of boolean algebra
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
MHB Solving Q.7 with Truth Tables: What Is the Right Conclusion?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB How Do Truth Tables and Venn Diagrams Verify Logical Equivalence?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad On the meaning of logical implication within specific context/models
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Prove validity of a cononclusion
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Validity Using Euler Circles and Truth Tables
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Help, find a statement using a truth table
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Which probability calculation is "more correct" in Baccarat games?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K