Validation of Ansys FEA solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter cabellos2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Fea
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on validating Ansys FEA solutions for a tension test specimen using Ansys Workbench. The primary focus is on calculating axial stress using the formula stress = force/area, which is deemed appropriate for this linear analysis. Participants agree that beam theories are not applicable in this context, as the analysis pertains to axial loading rather than bending. The discussion emphasizes the importance of comparing manual calculations with FEA results to ensure accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ansys Workbench 2023 knowledge
  • Understanding of axial stress calculations
  • Familiarity with linear analysis concepts
  • Basic principles of tensile testing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research manual calculation methods for axial stress in tension tests
  • Explore linear analysis techniques in Ansys Workbench
  • Study the differences between true stress-strain curves and linear stress analysis
  • Investigate validation techniques for FEA results against manual calculations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, FEA analysts, and researchers involved in materials testing and validation of finite element analysis solutions.

cabellos2
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
For the tension test specimen (shown below in the link) I am using Ansys Workbench to calculate the stress in the parallel portion. How could I go about checking this through manual calculations? I have been told to use beam theories for this, however I can't see how this applies as the force is being apllied axially therefore a simple axial stress = force/area would be most appropriate? Or is this incorrect. Some advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks

http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=testpiecexv0.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi cabellos2,

yeah, don't see much relation to bending of beams here. Well, other than tension of beams/rods as you thought yourself. Comparing the axial stress sounds appropriate for comparing the 2 (I'm thinking this is a linear analysis, i.e. an analysis where you focus on what is going on before yield stress and you don't have to think about the "other parts" of a tensile test, like true stress-strain curves and such).
 
I thought one of the reasons for having tensile stress specimens shaped the way they are is an attempt to get as close to P/A as possible, i.e. a 1D stress. I can't think of any beam theory that deals with this. It's easy enough to check your results. How did they compare?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K