Vanishing Wavefunction: Show Expectation Values of x and p Vanish

  • Thread starter Thread starter misterpickle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expectation values of position (x) and momentum (p) in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically using a modified wavefunction. The original poster is tasked with showing that these expectation values vanish when computed with the given wavefunction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to apply the integral forms of expectation values to the modified wavefunction. Some participants provide clarification on the definitions of expectation values and suggest algebraic manipulations rather than explicit integration.
  • Questions arise regarding the presence of the expectation value term within the wavefunction and whether this creates a discrepancy in the calculations.
  • Further discussion includes the implications of the distributive property of functions in the context of wavefunctions and the challenges posed by exponential terms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different aspects of the wavefunction and its implications for calculating expectation values. Clarifications have been provided regarding the nature of the terms involved, and there is a recognition of the need for substitutions in the integration process to relate the modified wavefunction back to the original.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of missing information from the problem statement, which may impact the understanding of the expectations being calculated. The discussion also highlights the complexity introduced by the wavefunction's structure and the assumptions made during the calculations.

misterpickle
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If <x> and <p> are the expectation values of x and p formed with the wave-function of a one-dimensional system, show that the expectation value of x and p formed with the wave-function vanishes. The wavefunction is:

[tex]\phi(x)=exp(-\frac{i}{h}\langle p\rangle x)\psi(x+\langle x\rangle)[/tex]Basically I don't know how to start this problem. Do I plug in the integral forms of the expectation values into the exponential and distribute the psi over x and [tex]\langle x\rangle[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out some important text, but I found the problem set with a google search. [tex]\langle x\rangle, \langle p\rangle[/tex] are computed with the wavefunction [tex]\psi(x)[/tex], i.e.

[tex]\langle x\rangle = \int x \psi^*(x) \psi(x) \, dx, \ldots[/tex]

You are asked to compute expectation values with the wavefunction [tex]\phi(x)[/tex]:

[tex]\langle x\rangle_\phi = \int x \phi^*(x) \phi(x) \, dx, \ldots[/tex]

These expressions can be reduced to expectation values for certain quantities in the wavefunction [tex]\psi(x)[/tex]. You don't have to do any integrals explicity, just some algebra and derivatives.
 
I've set it up the way you suggested, and the exponential terms computing [tex]\langle x \rangle[/tex] cancel. However there is a [tex]\langle x \rangle[/tex] term in [tex]\psi(x+\langle x \rangle)[/tex]. Is this not a discrepancy to have the value you are trying to calculate inside the equation for calculating its value?

Specifically,

[tex]\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}[/tex]
 
misterpickle said:
I've set it up the way you suggested, and the exponential terms computing [tex]\langle x \rangle[/tex] cancel. However there is a [tex]\langle x \rangle[/tex] term in [tex]\psi(x+\langle x \rangle)[/tex]. Is this not a discrepancy to have the value you are trying to calculate inside the equation for calculating its value?

Specifically,

[tex]\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}[/tex]

Well [tex]\langle x \rangle[/tex] is just a number (it came out of another integral over x, so it doesn't depend on x). There's still something you have to do to this integral though.
 
If [tex]\psi(x+\langle x \rangle)[/tex] is distributable (meaning [tex]f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)[/tex]) then I come up with the following:

[tex]\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}[/tex]
[tex]\int{ x[ (\psi^{*}x+\psi^{*}\langle x \rangle)( \psi x+\psi\langle x \rangle)\,dx}[/tex]
[tex]\int{ (\psi^{*}\psi x^{3}+2\psi^{*}\psi x^{2}\langle x \rangle+\psi^{*}\psi x\langle x \rangle^{2})\,dx}[/tex]
[tex]\langle x^{3}\rangle +2\langle x^{2}\langle x \rangle\rangle + \langle x\langle x\rangle^{2}\rangle[/tex]

...which doesn't make any sense to me. Also the "distributable" assumption I made does not work for exponentials, since [tex]f(x+y)=f(x)f(y)[/tex] for exponential functions.
 
Yeah wavefunctions will almost never have that property since they're always related to exponential functions. Think about how you can convert this to an expectation value in [tex]\psi(x)[/tex] by making a substitution in the integration variable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K