Variable compression ratio engine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and implementation of a Variable Compression Ratio (VCR) engine. Participants explore various methods to achieve variable compression, including mechanical modifications and innovative engineering concepts. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, practical challenges, and potential applications of VCR technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the methods used to change the compression ratio in a VCR engine, specifically referencing the SAAB Variable Compression (SVC) engine.
  • Another participant notes that the SAAB engine tilts the cylinder head to alter the volume, raising questions about sealing mechanisms in such designs.
  • Some participants propose using telescoping rods with hydraulic systems to adjust the length of connecting rods, while others express skepticism about the feasibility of such designs due to potential fatigue issues.
  • There is a suggestion to modify cam timing to achieve variable compression, which some participants find intriguing.
  • One participant discusses a "cushion" system proposed by Bruce Crower, which absorbs excessive cylinder pressure to create a variable compression effect, although its practicality is questioned.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity and costs associated with adjustable components in the engine design, with suggestions to explore alternative mechanisms like moving the crankshaft instead.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the locking mechanism for the connecting rod and its implications for balancing and vibrations during operation.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for a quick return mechanism to enhance power output, though this raises concerns about jerks and vibrations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and approaches to achieving variable compression, with no clear consensus on the best method. Several competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the practicality and effectiveness of proposed designs.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various engineering challenges, including the need for strong materials to withstand stress and the complexities of implementing adjustable mechanisms in a rotating assembly. There are also unresolved questions about the sealing and efficiency of different designs.

Who May Find This Useful

Engineers, automotive enthusiasts, and students interested in advanced engine technologies and variable compression systems may find this discussion relevant.

shreesh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I m making a project on Variable Compression Ratio (VCR)engine and have got some ideas for attaining Variable Compression Ratio in an engine.
i studied ur SAAB Variable Compression (SVC) engine,i found it quite intrewsting and innovative,but i wud like to have some more information about that engine that ll be helpful in my project.my area of interest is:

1.how u are changin the Compression Ratio?
2.can it be done in a running engine?
3.how are u locking it in one Compression Ratio position?

i ll be highly glad to receive a reply from ur side n looking forward for the d same
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Interesting engine - it tilts the cylinder head by a few degrees to change the volume without requiring any changes to the mechanics of the cylinder/head valve assembly or the pistons.

No details on how they manage the sealing but on a small capacity engine it gives a big range in compression ratios.
 
Welcome to PF, Shreesh.
I must admit that I've never even heard of a VCR engine until now. I share Mgb's curiosity about how SAAB managed to seal that split-block design. Since GM shelved the project upon acquiring SAAB, I assume that there were some serious problems.
There are a couple of other ways to achieve VCR that I can think of, but both would be pretty difficult to implement. One would be to use telescoping rods with internal hydraulic cylinders fed from a pressure supply piped through the crankshaft. The other would be to tweak the cam timing so that the compression stroke would force some of the fresh charge back through the intake valve into the manifold.
 
Have a search for Miller cycle engines. It's not quite what you're after but it'll be interesting for you nonetheless; it effectively let's you have unequal compression and expansion strokes.
 
Danger said:
One would be to use telescoping rods with internal hydraulic cylinders fed from a pressure supply piped through the crankshaft.
The advantage of the tilt is that it doesn't significantly change the shape of the combustion chamber so all the fluid dynamics of the burn are the same.
I think introducing extra cylinders etc into the chamber to reduce the volume would lead to an inefficent burn.
I would have though of having the valves seal against the walls of the a valve cylinder rather than a seat then you could retract the valves slightly to change the volume - and you could use the same mechanism as for variable valve timing.
 
I think that you misunderstood what I meant about the hydraulics. My idea was just to have a system whereby you can lengthen or shorten the con rods. The hyraulics would be inside the rods. There would be no effect upon the combustion chamber shape; the pistons would just extend a different distance into them.
I don't quite get an image of what you mean about the valves. Can you elaborate a bit, or maybe post a picture? It sounds interesting, but I'm just not sure about what the plan is.
 
I see - I thought you meant a sort of plunger piston to occupy some of the volume of the chamber.

Instead of the valves pushing out into the cylinder and sealing flush against the valve seats - I imagined having them as miniture pistons with piston rings. They would go forward to allow the fuel in but instead of sealing flush they could retract into mini piston bores. The further they retracted the more volume added to the combustion.
 
c wat method i chose 2 attain this was by changin d conn rod length as said by danger..
i wud like 2 kno how conn rod needs modification,n wat changes it requires...as i was thinkin of havin a slidin mech either at d crank or near d gudgeon pin so dat d effective rod length is alterd...
at present i wud appreciate comments on its designin,stress analysis n dyanamic analysisof such a method..

and for further info on VCR engine u can visit
http://www.mce-5.com/vcr_strategy/index.htm

http://www.gomecsys.com/uk/go-engine_how_does_the_goengine_work.html

also i have seen yamaha havin engine of this type,link i ll b sendin shortly..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yikes, on the expanding / contracting connecting rod! Its tough enough to build a really good, tough connecting rod without any fatigue issues, let alone implementing that...

I did see an interesting idea put forth by bruce crower in this latest issue of "automotive engineering". He mentions a "cushion" system built into the cylinder head that would simply absorb excessive cylinder pressure, and release that energy as the pressure starts to fall again... Pretty smart actually! His concept was to build the engine to a 15:1 or 16:1 or similar compression ratio, which the engine would operate at under low load... Under high load, it would soak up some of that excessive cylinder pressure, in a way creating a variable compression ratio.

The article did note he has already applied for a patent, although that doesn't mean much as far as anything actually working.

I do quite a bit of work with forged steel connecting rods for the aftermarket vw scene, I think you will find that anything adjustable in that system will cause masses and costs to skyrocket, or the MEP and peak cylinder pressures of your system to have to fall dramatically, as well as the operating speed of the engine. It may still work, but personally I'd keep it out of the rotating assembly! How about moving the whole crankshaft up and down? Same effect, but at least your massive control system does not need to reciprocate or rotate, which is a very good thing.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
As soon as I got in bed last night, I realized how stupid my suggestion in the above post is- obviously the crankshaft can't be moving, if you want to couple anything to it directly. What would work though and would be neat would be a eccentric bushing insert inside a relatively standard connecting rod. Granted, you would end up with a slight quick return action, but its possible that may not be a bad thing. The real trick there would be setting up some sort of control system that can actually hold the bushing where it needs to be, when the forces start getting really high. It also has to be very fast acting or the whole thing will be a waste of time.
 
  • #11
Or, achieve the same effect by clever cam timing.
 
  • #12
actually d exact waqy of locking d conn rod only is giving me sleepless nights.
its true dat its a rotatin n reciprocatin part,bt i think if i have some concrete idea, n some better materiall with gr8er strength,stress won't come in its way..

hey i wud like u all 2 comment on its balancing, at different positions...
also it ll giv a quik return effect if i don't lock d rod,bt i m not gettin ur idea of quik return,i mean i don't have much idea of it,.

and 2 ur surprise , i was alongside thinkin of puttin a quik return mech instead of normal slider mech,which i think ll boost up d power output,bt it ll give serious jerks n vibrations..

wats ur say??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
105
Views
25K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
23K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K