Variance of a summation of Gaussians

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeriousNoob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation Variance
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the variance of a summation of Gaussian random variables. The formula for the variance of the average of N Gaussian variables is derived, emphasizing that the mean remains zero due to the properties of Gaussian distributions. Key principles used include the variance of a scaled random variable and the variance of the sum of uncorrelated random variables. The user expresses confusion about the transition between steps in the textbook, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts. Overall, the conversation highlights foundational aspects of probability theory related to Gaussian variables.
SeriousNoob
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to follow a step in the textbook but I don't understand.

var\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}w[n]\right)\\<br /> =\frac{1}{N^2}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}var(w[n])
where w[n] is a Gaussian random variable with mean = 0 and variance = 1

Homework Equations



Var(X) = \operatorname{E}\left[X^2 \right] - (\operatorname{E}[X])^2.<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


The mean is 0 because a summation of Gaussian is Gaussian.
But squaring the whole expression doesn't seem right as there seems to be a trick used to go from line 1 to 2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Two facts are being used here:

1. If X is a random variable and c is a constant, then \text{var}(cX) = c^2\text{var}(X).
2. If X and Y are uncorrelated random variables, then \text{var}(X + Y) = \text{var}(X) + \text{var}(Y). From this, it's an easy induction to handle the sum of N uncorrelated random variables.

Both of these facts are straightforward to prove and should be found in any probability book.
 
Thanks a lot. Haven't touched random variables for a while and the summation threw me off.

The proofs for those facts are indeed very straightforward.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
631
Replies
0
Views
884
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K